But i really want to see this pod on both of aircraft.
We probably won’t see it on the Su-25T but a tech tree Su-25TM.
TM is the same aircraft as 39, i think they wouldn’t add the same plane to tech tree.
Look at the Su-25 and Su-25K, same with A-10A Early and A-10A Late they have few differences, same case with Su-39 and Su-25TM. So personally, I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility, especially after community backlash.
1 Like
Maybe you’re right but su-25 and su-25k were add in the same patch. I don’t think they would add 25TM now but i could be wrong.
I believe it’s either Su-25TM or Su-25SM3 next.
we will see
137mm pen at what range and angle?
Because the 76mm M1 on Hellcat does approx 150mm at 0m in game.
1 Like
1 more su-25 can be painful, but adding a su-25sm3 modification for su-25t can be useful(I know they are 2 separate plane but it’s better than 1 more su-25 )
In fact Su-39 armed R-27R1 & R-77 but gaijin might consider 2 medium-range BVR Air-to-Air Missile after introduced rank IX for fighter aircraft toptier and Su-39 move to rank VIII in the future
no gun?
2 x 20mm rear guns. I think it tracks and leads the target automatically, the gunner just presses a button to fire. Not sure how it would fit in game, may be a bit OP depending on the range it can do it.
1 Like
I‘d like to see object 490a “rebel” in future. Clearly, for these objs with 152mm gun and good armor, no other tanks can fight them, like object 195 and 477. So, object 490a “rebel”，with a better 125mm gun and reasonable armor(700-800mm rha as I know), can be a good choice. Also, 8° depression angle, and 25km/h reverse speed can end soviet player’s headache.
10 Likes
Do 24T with 30mm Mk 101 in the middle turret, could be used as a Low BR gunship like AC 130.
And optional to switch through the different tested armarment like the Mg 151/15 here.
Another Do 24 V1 was armed with a 20mm Mg 204 in HDL 151/1 (20mm Mg 204 fires the 20x105 mm ammo like the S-18/100 found on the Csaba)
6 Likes
NGL a questionable choice but I respect it. Its questionable because sure it has good armour but the thing is this project was denied so fast (1981-1986 dev. time).
Its questionable because there were two prototypes, one being completed, having a better gun than 2A46 while being 125mm one, it was fully completed. While the second version that was supposed to fix problems found with first version while mounting 152 gun and better fire control system wasnt finished due to program being closed in favor of Obj. 477
This is first version.
Also this might be a rumor but first version might have had 700hp 5TDF engine, second one had 1250 hp 6TD-2 engine, at least proposed. And if it does have 5TDF, I dont think it will be an end line vehicle.
3 Likes
Completely different planes though, its not really a simple modification.
It’s probably the same gun
1 Like
Oh, I see.
So most likely this gun was a lightweight version of 76mm M1, just like the Chaffee’s 75mm M6 was a lightweight version of 75mm M3?
That makes sense, considering they seem to have similar performance (from what I could find online)
1 Like
that armor wont be much of an issue once we get 130 and 140mm mbt prototypes in game. The data we have on some of the old 140mm apfsds is they could pen about 900mm of armor.
Honestly i hope someone buys war thunder so we can finally start speeding up the addition of vehicles.
By the time we get to the leo 2a7v and m1a2 sep3v with tusk2 itll be the year 2056.
Huge no lol