Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees)

Sadly these have been denied but SU34 is sexy and would be nice

1 Like

The SU-34 is absolutely cracked, 12.7 is criminal for that thing.

I personally Su-34 basic located after Su-24M & Su-24M2 Fencer-D at bomber line, Su-34 could be 12.7 BR min or 13.0 BR max

Sukhoi Su-34 carry 3rd generation targeting pod Sapsan-E, so MiG-29SMT (9-19) could carry Sapsan-E too

I guess gajin might consider Rafale LF.1 (French Navy), Eurofighter Typhoon FA.2 (RAF) and Eurofighter DA (Luftwaffe & Aeronautica Militare) at the same time but after 2023

2 Likes

Well, it doesn’t accel at air to air, only pulling ~9G while losing a ton of energy (though probably with decent AOA). So in Air-RB it would serve at best a missile carrier (with a loadout capability kind-of comparable to the F14B), and at air to ground, it only really slightly outpaces the current loadouts on the F16C. It has ground radar but things that have them in game now, such as the MI-28, well, no one really uses it due to the difficultly and lack of practicality.

13 br maybe, if it was allowed to carry it’s full load of A2A ordinance.

For Germany
CV90120 from Switzerland

CV90-120-switzerland

and the CV9035 MKIII from Switzerland

5 Likes

The only playerbase that I’ve actively seen asking for copy paste

1 Like

It’s a joke?

2 Likes

I don’t know. Something middle eastern. Doesn’t have to be Iran

The entire suggestion is nonsensical, the only reasonable thing to do is treat it as a joke even if it wasn’t intended.

2 Likes

Yes this makes 100% sense. Iran is gifting israel rockets directly after all

1 Like

☹️

Poland had a blood feud with Germany, only reason they stopped is because they hate Russia more.
Ukraine has had a blood feud and would rather fry the servers then be put under Russia. Only reason they’ve been calm is because they’ve been left on their own post Soviet collapse.
Turkey has M60 and F-16, but they’re one step away from getting kicked out of NATO because they keep pissing the U.S and the rest NATO off.
South Korea has a blood feud with Japan still, they only called down because they hate China more.
North Korea makes sense.
Iran and Israel? That’s like putting the U.S and Russia together as the same tech tree except in the Middle East.

1 Like

I can see the Ukrainian and Turkish idea, but not the Polish and Iran.

No no no no no

T-80BM (Object 219M)




After Rank 8 gets implemented for Ground battles I believe T-80BVM should move to 12.0, with T-80BM (with or without proposed 1400 HP engine) should be 12.3.

Now you can see it doesnt have Relikt side ERA for its hull but does seem to have both UFP and turret (even side) ERA Relikt. Doesnt have 3RD gen thermal imager for Sosna U (3RD gen is a replaced russian thermal imager), but it has 2ND gen “Plisa” thermal sight for its 1G46M sight (like one found on T-80U but upgraded, unsure yet what was changed, will make sure to check later)
BqUWBrHhAg8
This is photo of 1G46 and Plisa thermal nearby (not from inside of T-80BM, this is just for reference of their placement).
2E42M gives same 40° turret rotation speed as 2E58 found on T-80BVM.
Gun and autoloader is same as on T-80BVM we have in game.
1400 HP engine was created and proposed for T-80BM, though I am unsure if it was installed on only prototype. (2006-2008 development process, 10 years earlier than T-80BVM acception into service date)

T-80UE-1
S2BLghELpzY
NCga-8-yins
lpZb4wa-coI
11.7
From T-80U theres such changes as: 2A46M-4 gun with autoloader modified to use rounds with length uo to 740mm (basically 3BM60), they both seem to use T-80UD (same T-80U) turret, theres two prototypes, one fitted with NVG, second prototype is with “Plisa” 2nd generation thermal sight, 1G46 sight remains for both.
I am suggesting to add second prototype, shown on second image with Plisa thermal sight.
T-80UE-1 has 2E42M-1 stabiliser, getting it same 40° as 2E58 found on T-80BVM.
Now theres a lot of minor and not changes to the vehicle, same as for T-80BM that dont really much for War Thunder.
T-80UE-1, on par with T-80UA was accepted into service in 2005 (IIRC), I am not sure if there were any orders or amount of T-80 tanks being upgraded to T-80UE-1/T-80UA standart.
Edit: There is around 30 T-80UE-1 made with thermals and autoloader&gun upgrade to use 3BM60.
I do understand if ratings seem unfair, and I would honestly add 0.3 to each of suggested vehicles, but knowing how long introduction of Rank 8 for Aircraft is going, with there still being no 12.7 BR planes whatsoever, it will take months, ages.

3 Likes

Alphajet A at 10.7? For what reason?

Just why, the BVP M-80 barely has Soviet components and has more in common with Western IFVs…

It is same as with Praga M53/59. That vehicles have 0 things to do with Russia. Whole vehicle was made in Czechoslovakia. But because Czechoslovakia was occupied by Soviet Russian like whole Easter block, Gaijin decided to give it to Russia.

1 Like

Kinda like Indian T90S, except here the occupation wasnt even there in time T-90S was bought.

Gajin do what they want when adding vehicles that related to nations that are in game there is no rule on them

1 Like