Nothing asinine here.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Attacking people isn’t helping your argument.
I think the perfect solution would be to remove fire and forget ordinance from helicopters all together and then increase helicopter SP across the board.
CAS as a whole should have their SP costs massively increased but thats a whole other discussion
1 Like
I want more LAV variants in the game, the LAV hull is already in the game as AA (LAV-AD), I don’t think it would be that time and resource consuming to add other LAV variants.
LAV-25mm
LAV-AT (TOW missile turret)
Another variant of LAV-AT (TOW missile turret)
LAV-120mm
LAV-105mm
13 Likes
yeah, seen 2 of them in person, can confirm theyd be pretty balanced
yea i want them to be added so bad, they seem like a fun vehicle to play. I had so much fun with LAV-AD and i want more. LAV-AD is easily one of my favourite vehicle in the game, its a fun tank to play.
I’ll take “shit that ain’t ever gonna happen” for 1000 Alex.
So why do you want to have only the current vehicles have access to the capability?
Lol… lmao even…
Considering my point went orbital over your head and you have immediately went straight into insulting people who disagree with you I will just go ahead and mute you since i don’t really care to debate a child.
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
That it not exatly true. For example Brimstone is able to diffirentiate things it is locking mid flight, and guide onto the correct one.
Apparently none of the proposed dutch capital ships have been suggested. Ill look into that when the semester is over.
I think we are missing a few of the LatAm ones too.
But my current projects are British cruisers which were laid down.
Welp more stuff for people to cry about when there is no chance its ever added.
More realistic than the AHS or MI-28A…
And yet people will still cry about it even if they removed both AHS amd MI28, simple reason people see sweden=cry on forums about them.
Im for the Norwegian or the Swedish UH-60 as they both can mount hellfire and such and are more realistic but people will still cry about it.
1 Like
Yeah, and I really don’t understand why, like, helicopters aren’t broken, they aren’t even remotely good anymore in anything resembling contested airspace.
As for the AHS; this is the only image I could find on it:
(Still makes it realer than the MI-24A; as it actually has Swedish markings on it!)
3 Likes
I don’t really think swedish uh-60 have rwr, countermeasures , maws it will be either a crap vehicle if implemented that way at the current br or it will be unbalanced if lower br
Eh, people would cry about it even if it sat at 11.0 without CM’s or rwr because its on sweden. Regardless the community would complain because thats just kinda how the community is. If people didn’t cry about something 90% of the forums here wouldn’t exist.
I want the F22 and the Su57
1 Like