I don’t want to see a MiG-29 for American, they just don’t need it at all.
For Japan though depending on their tech trees situation in the future the MiG-25 could be added.
Agreed, if we’re talking captured vehicles then anyone could have pretty much anything, I mean it’s silly enough with the WWII stuff, is there even a tree that doesn’t have a Sherman at this point, and there’s no need to extend that to the cold war, the USA has plenty of aircraft already, the last thing they need is a MiG-29.
Leopard 2A7 Hull with Leclerc SXXI turret
So huh ? Leoclerc ? Lecpard ? X)
1 Like
Then russia does not need the P63, P47, B25, SU-8m SU-11, etc, etc… So shall we start by taking those away? I am going to guess likely no. How about every nation getting a Sherman.
It is fine if the US gets its Mig-29. They already opened this can of worms.
It should be added as a event vehicle.
It could be a nice premium tank for US
itll be an interesting one since all its weapons are russian lol
but the U of S of A can still get this one
although what they can kill with that peashooter idk
1 Like
This is a problem, that type of mentality is toxic, many people share it unfortunately.
2 Likes
Indeed, Schande über ihn! (Shame on him)
Does anybody have any info on this thing? I know it’s a type of typhoon vdv 4x4 with the 2a42 cannon and konkurs atgms, but I can’t find any info on that certain type of version. Also, gaijin when???
1 Like
Called the ‘K-4386 ZA-SpN Titan’.
The turret is a variation of the 32V01 30mm RCWS.
Other than that, don’t know any other details.
1 Like
Thanks. I hope to make a suggestion about it one day
1 Like
Yeah its pretty unique and interesting.
I expect gaijin consider change targeting pod on F-16C Block 50 from AN/AAQ-28(V) Litening II 2nd gen targeting pod to 3rd gen targeting pod AAQ-28(V)4 Litening AT next month or december this year
Why, the LITENING II is more than good enough for it’s current BR?
But I never actually wanted Ukraine to be a subtree.
I can agree that it will likely be how Gaijin adds it into the game, in a stupid, shortsighted decision, but I am certainly against it
——————————————————————————————
But here again we may run into a balance/bloat issue, as we progress forward in ground forces, we have all seen the crazy military acquisition Poland has been doing recently.
And so, it would be M1s, K2s, PT-91s, T-84U/M/T….
The only way for Ukraine to be in game is as its own seperate, independent, not-in-anyone’s-“sphere-of-influence” techtree.
Even if it is mainly ground forces with limited air and naval.
Something we can also say about real life….
2 Likes