You are right. J-10’s design came from J-9. J-9 was proposed before Lavi was made.
Event vehicle USA aircraft in rank 8 from my idea
TAV-8B Harrier II
F-15 Dual Role Fighter Prototype
F/A-18B Hornet
Gaijin wheres Agile eye HMD for F-15A?
Some improvements & additions to the french helicopter tree
-
6x AS.11 for the Alouette III
-
Rockets for the H34
-
6x HOT for the Gazelle
-
French helicopters whose copy are in the chinese tree
-
SA.361HCL Predecessor to the SA.365M Panther
-
Modern variant of the AS.550 Fennec with AGM-114 & Laser guided rockets
-
H-Force armed variant of the EC725/H225M
There is this strange North Korean artillery with three 370mm recoilless rifles, I would like to know more about it and maybe see it in War Thunder:
Spoiler
In North Korea, it is called the “1984 type 3-body 370mm self-propelled anti-propellant gun.” A 5-axle, 10-wheeled armored vehicle equipped with three large and beautiful 370mm caliber guns. Considering that it has 12 wheels on 6 axles, the chassis is likely to be based on an old Soviet tank chassis such as the Cheonmaho or T-72, and the crew is said to have a total of 5 people. Since it can fire three 370mm rounds at once, it seems to have the highest instantaneous firepower, but the rate of fire doesn’t need to be mentioned…
The detailed arrangement is unknown, but since it is an object that did not appear even at the military parade, it is estimated that only one or a few units were made for experimentation and then canceled. It seems that it was judged that the value for money was not right. However, due to the nature of North Korea’s military system, which is very heavy, it may have been deployed in actual combat, and with the firepower of 370mm, even if it is a 3.5th generation tank, its inability to fight against a direct hit from a high-explosive bullet is certain and it is at a level where it can be destroyed, so it is used as an anti- tank gun is more threatening than any other tank in North Korea, so sufficient caution is required in case of emergency. In particular, this model is easier to use for anti-tank purposes rather than multiple launch rockets.[3]
[3] However, due to the nature of the recoilless gun, it is a direct fire gun rather than a howitzer, so there is bound to be a limit to the range. In order to shoot, you must be in a straight line with the enemy tank and its power is certain, but its rate of fire is so disastrous that annihilation is guaranteed the moment you fail to kill with one hit.
https://en.namu.wiki/w/%EC%9E%90%EC%A3%BC%EB%AC%B4%EB%B0%98%EB%8F%99%ED%8F%AC#rfn-3
There is also this Naval apparition with a 305 mm recoilless rifle (Soviet?)
I think the issue Gaijin is facing with Patrias are that, they want to add a Finnish service Patria to Finnish tech tree but there’s no viable one with an offensive role and all other Patria variants are just export variants and wants to add them as premiums.
…
And Yea, I still dont get why BMP-2MD is not in Finnish TT
There really arent any other than AMOS that could be added with that logic, tho I dont really see any reason as why gaijin would want only finnish service ones in the tree, has gaijin devs said this somewhere?
Bro doesn’t remember the CV90105 TML
NH90
NH90M For naval
Sea Lynx for Naval
Sea King for Naval
In all respective nations.
Is that tank throwing a granade?
Thats what I have wondered for years, only thing I know its a smoke grenade.
also that picture looks uncany and sureal. That is a model kit tank right?
Nope
Type 19 new family (recognizable by the different layout of tires compared to the ZLT-11 present in game)
Su-30M2 (should have already been added)
7,5 cm Provisorisk stormpjäs.
That curvy gunshield got me dreaming.
People would lose their shit if USSR would get the ATGMs this particular modification was shipped with.
Has spall liners for its crew, soldiers. Uses same turret as BTR-82AT, having 2nd gen thermal.
Engine mounted front, 330 HP, for 20 tons thats bad, new transmission.
I personally am excited for BTR-82AT
This vehicle is adopted, produced, it serves.
Cage armour would be optional as we have seen them be removed.
Thermal gunner sight, still same kevlar at the sides as on BTR-82A.
Yet lighter than this one, 300HP at 15 tons is better.
Compared to BTR-80A the mobility us slight impoved (if you remove cage armour), stabilisation for gunner, laser rangefinder,multi channel thermal gun sight with 1-8x zoom.
One thing I wish for is for them to fix magnification on BMP-2 and BTR-80As, as it should be 1.2-4x, and not just 4x.
Yet they refuse to fix it.
Because of their policy to not make 1x gun sight magnifications cus “aw our shitty ahh stock WT sight will be barely readable”.
I wonder who’s fault it is Gaijin.
This policy also affects Type 90 from what I heard.
UPD: found details on BTR-82AT sight, it’s actually 1-8, not 1,2-4.