I think it’s the short barreled gun, like pz4. Idc if it’s mortar tho
Russian Toyota Mega Cruiser BXD10 with a ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft twin-barrel auto cannon.
M-84D
Spoiler
5 Likes
It’s a artillery observe vehicle I think, the cannon is fake.
I wish that the devs would stop with the darn shrinking maps!
If players have problems with Big maps with varying terrain please make us able to select if we want CQB then you can pick it, Then if you dont have so short of a patience you can have bigger maps where you have to cover a larger area. And if you get attacked from behind. That is you and your teams fault not the games fault. You let him in!!
The Lvkv 42 is a vehicle that our national museum has no information about, other than its made during the 50s and what gun, engine it uses. Nothing else. No history either!
Here the great punch to the neck. They have both variants in their inventory
Shouldnt that mf get apds or something?
Iirc I saw some info a while back that it did.
1 Like
indeed it should, The VEAK 40 also used it in its ammo belt, 120mm of pen at 90 degrees at 100 meters
Oh dang, thats actually really good. Finally somr way to make up for the lack of ammo…
1 Like
however if it received APDS it would no doubt go to 6.7 - 7.3… and the VEAK 40, would probably go to 9.0 - 9.7
True…
At least it would give us another non-bkan spaa around that BR.
Wouldnt mind seeing it, 40mm APDS sounds fun.
Besides that we need to fix these things for the Lvkv 42 to be great:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/bAH81eN0NyBS
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/o0C4MWEJdVPF
Pls no, id rather having actual spaa that can handle the aircraft at its br rather than another td disguised as an spaa
1 Like
yea that is what I’m thinking, additionally it gives gaijin a excuse to not add more SPAA since the (insert Swedish SPAA) Would be soo good.
Ill say it again swedens spaa only exist from 2.3 amd then dont exist until hit 8.7, then stop existing until you hit 10.3, everything else is a TD
The Lvkv 40 is a barely adequate SPAA, not outstanding but good. But the rest i agree with you
2 Likes
At least you know how to have a conversation, god i was about to go crazy in the next major update forum lol.
1 Like
No, I respect others opinions as long as they aren’t just throwing false claims out of their asses. Like how the Ikv 103 is OP or for that fact. That every other Swedish tank is OP. We just focused on Firepower and mobility. if you argue the following tanks are OP its mostly Gaijin´s fault for implementing their gameplay that certain way like the following:
(Any 37mm Sabot tank): um, have you heard of spall ricochet effect in War thunder? No? yea thought so. You are being defeated by experienced players with knowledge of its opponents. No armour,
Strv 42 DT: Actually pretty balanced, its cannon is only saved by the autoloader, and again it trades armour for Firepower. Mobility is comparable with Russian tanks.
Pvkv II: Seriously? anyhow, trades mobility AND Protection for a Great gun. Pretty much impossible to fire on the move. Just requires a certain playstyle that when practised seems unfair.
Ikv 103: A really nice Light Casemate TD with good mobility and Firepower. That only really performs well in a defensive roll where all Swedish tanks shine.
Ikv 91: Nah, i cant argue with that Its a really good Light tank!
Strv 103: I’m sorry, do you understand that killing its engine effectively means its dead. It was made to protect its crew to the greatest of its ability.
Since here in Sweden we have a lot of forests and untouched nature. Additionally the smaller bridges. We cant have heavy tanks since they would have a hard time moving through our land.
So to summarise Sweden trades most of its armour for Firepower, then during the cold war we started prioritising armour and protection of its crew
