Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 3)

It’s a protection system we have muss 1.0 currently on the puma but muss 2.0 is a massive improvement

They took the blue pill huh

Mi-Mil 17’s operated by the Mexican Marines/Navy. Was upgraded to use SNEB’s and 12.7mm HMG’s

mex01
mex08

5 Likes

Now that subtrees and sheet are a lot more wide, remove the fanfiction made up ho ri tanks as yall promised to do.

And bring back coelian to tt.

2 Likes

I find it funny Mexico uses a lot of Soviet stuff you would think with there location and the USA they would be using 100% American stuff.

1 Like

holy peak

Another reason to add the Polish tech tree 🤞

3 Likes

If you have contact with the Polish Minister of Defense tell them to stop using the 30 mm Bushmaster II Mk 44 for God’s sake, I don’t want to play with a brand new vehicle just to have some mediocre post-pen damage, I have no doubt that they can use or even replicate the 30 mm 2A42.

1 Like

Start calling up every other NATO country then

5 Likes

Being part of NATO doesn’t mean chaining yourself to someone’s rule.

7 Likes

If you want better access to spare parts and ammunition, it is something that you do, we don’t have the ability to make our own cannons yet so we go and buy what all the other NATO nations use. In real life the Bushmaster is more accurate and more reliable than the 2A42, and where are we supposed to get the 2A42 from? We only ever used the cannon for a limited time.

9 Likes


peasants, GTS-30//N combines both 😎

4 Likes

Its Slovakian so no one cares

4 Likes

Stop taking it too serious. Poland has the ability to print main battle tanks and whatever but isn’t capable of producing its own autocannon? How is that possible? On other topic Systems like TURRA can fit 30 mm 2A42 or the 30 mm GTS-30 as @DrunkenLamp has pointed out. I personally think that this whole choice for the 30 mm Bushmaster II Mk 44 is not only more technical choice (for a more reliable autocannon with accuracy in mind) but more cultural-political stuff which I don’t think we need to get into. I just hope that if polish vehicles were to be added—GTS-30, 2A42 or similars could be added in some of their platforms.

The only thing that stops me from supporting the addition of more infantry fighting vehicles, specially western infantry fighting vehicles, specially operated by NATO-members nations is the presence of the 30 mm Bushmaster II Mk 44: I doubt Gaijin will “improve” its post-penetration damage, nor it will add the supposed burst mode, nor it will improve NATO-operated anti-armor systems like the Spike-LR II because:

  • HEAT still does poor damage, such low caliber and low explosive mass of these missiles doesn’t help the situation either;
  • Gaijin don’t want to add systems that can give the player scores easy as lock and launch for ground vehicles (apparently).

I’m just using logic

this

Also fits the bushmaster as well, it depends on what the country can afford and their present logistics

1 Like

Fair enough.

I don’t like 30 mm Bushmaster II Mk 44 really for reasons I’ve mentioned previously. Consistency. image

Yes, TURRA RCWS can fit most 30 mm autocannon alternative primarly 30 mm Bushmaster II Mk 44 and GTS-30, it’s a shame that Borsuk is being with the former.

Because you only think in wt terms. The bushmaster and mk30 and all other NATO 30mms are 100x better IRL

5 Likes

I think in War Thunder terms because at the end of the day War Thunder is the main subject of any discussion in the Forums.

1 Like

By that logic any future weaponry that could be added to war thunder should be taken in war thunder logic, if it’s western nerf it, if it’s russian buff it?

1 Like

What logic?

Show me where’s this logic that Gaijin has denied the addition of western-made weapons to the game because they’re bad? Specifically the autocannons, as far as I’m concerned during the Heavy Cavalry, the latest Major update released on 24th of June it was introduced the Hunter AFV for the israeli tech tree, it houses a system with the 30 mm Bushmaster II Mk 44, in my opinion a bad autocannon because of these reasons that I’ll quote again below in case you have missed it:

By that logic of:

To acknowledge this logic first I’ll need to bash my head against the wall and type this with my foot. Gaijin has never denied a weapon or vehicle because they’re bad in some way, or because there are better vehicles, Vilkas, EFV and M1296 are examples of that having the worst numbers for kill-death ratio currently.