And then bug report the issues.
1 Like
Yes a woodern mock up turret. What wasn’t enough for gajin
The 3d model, and armor model is that of the mock up not the actual vehicle buddy, you can go look it up it’s more than “ThE GuN WrOng”. The transmission is wrong, the engine is wrong, the model is wrong, etc. Also do you think I can single handedly fix the entire game with my own bug reports? I’ve made several that’s been accepted in different vehicles and still hasn’t been fixed after 3-5 years. Me reporting all this doesn’t matter. Gaijin doesn’t CARE LOL.
It was enough for Gaijin to model the ENTIRE Is-6 on, not just the “turret” 😆. Selective realism.
Then go and bug report it and try make gajin change it if you believe it’s wrong idk what your so upset over
1 Like
Your clueless and just overly upset there’s actually no point talking to you.
1 Like
You think gaijin doesn’t/didn’t already get bug reports for this? I can’t make repeat bug reports of things already reported that’s stupid asf. I don’t think you know how the game works. Just don’t get mad at me next time before understanding my basic argument and try knowing more about the vehicles you’re getting rowdy about…
“bUg Report it”
Isn’t an argument. It’s been done already buddy. Keep UP.
There’s no point in talking to your bad faith behind either lol. Who cares?
You the only one mad here lmao literally the only upset person
1 Like
You literally went on a tirade saying stuff you made up to get mad about. Creating a straw man argument to just spam bs. Yes that’s annoying to most human beings with a soul. Sorry?
I want to be able to play 1.0 to 3.0 Boats in Enduring Confrontation! I gotta drive my VS-8 and leave mines everywhere like a rat!
3 Likes
Girl what are you on about
Your initial reply where you sounded crazy and on something making up voices. Stuff I’ve never made an argument about :).
You got upset over them using the planned weaponry of the is6 (what would be no different if it was called dt25) and then over the BVM and other tanks being incorrect traverse but go and prove gajin wrong about that instead of getting upset over the forums lmao go for a walk or something.
Have you considered there’s not enough information on the is6 armour? Or the fact the used a planned gun and engine to make it better.
And even have you considered they gave the Russian tanks a experimental fcs to support the faster traverse to make Russians tanks more competitive over NATO tanks go bug report anything you believe is wrong and if you don’t get a answer you can forward it to Smin or other mods to nudge them.
And this whole thing is because it the program stopped being funded post Soviet collapse so they used planned weaponry and that’s fine. Your getting upset over literally nothing
1 Like
The breech and reload speed would be different. Again, because you simply don’t know enough about this topic we should end the discussion. I don’t feel like teaching a random person about what gravitational pull is (I don’t feel like spoon feeding you basic information you should’ve known before engaging with me lol). This is beyond my patience threshold. Have a good day.
Planned? Show me photos of it having those things attached, or separate. I’ll take photos. I’ll wait.
That’s not what planned means at all lmao they weren’t mounted to the plane
What is a different model and something irrelevant to gajin and the game
Oh, so I can show you the Tiger II’s planned rangefinder. But you can’t show photos of that? Yikes. I’ll wait idc I believe in you!