i mean its 50/50 for me tank like this, its 50% made but we don’t know it the tiger turret would work so i don’t know if i want it
Well not exactly a tiger turret I don’t believe but very similar since it was basically the tank that lead to the tiger 1 the tank like any unfinished prototype belongs a place
still this opens the way to a path i dont waht the game follow, was even the turret builded separately? because then everyone will wants their unfinished prototypes
What has always been allowed. There’s never been a issue with unfinished prototypes
The turret was never made and that’s again why it’s unfinished lol the path to unfinished prototypes has been open I mean ho229 v3 was added 12 years ago none of them were armed irl
1 Like
What I said had nothing to do with there being examples. You’re way too quick and confident about being upset about that statement to realize you don’t know what I am talking about.
The IS-6 3D model is I CORRECT. Armor model INCORRECT. It’s a mish mash of the Mock Up 3D model, plus the engine of one, and a gun that WAS NEVER MOUNTED.
T-80BVM/72B3/90M all having 40 x 40 gun handling without there being explicit proof of such being the case. I remember the system described that could be capable of 40 x 40 handling speeds was the opposite system described by a crew who captured a T-90M… Why are there reports of a different system in those vehicles, and the in game versions having the fast one? I do remember figuring out IT IS A REAL FCS. It was tested on the T-72A on proving grounds. Whether or not it actually made it into the B3, BVM, and 90M all equally in mass? That’s a different discussion.
Yak 141 is well know for having things it didn’t have as a prototype. Meanwhile things like the HSTVL and RDFLT are missing more than they unrealistically have. I think the RDF has maybe 2 things it shouldn’t have that don’t even necessarily make it better in game… My point wasn’t “ThEy DonT ExiSt”
Back to the FCS drives, I’d like to think they’d probably save them all for the BVM or 90M rather than waste it on the B3. They’ve done this with Relikt… The B3 still uses K5 ERA frontally.
So again, I think you’re getting mad about things you simply do not know. Just educate yourself and ask why someone says something. Stop assuming whatever tf soothed your mind. That’s bad faith and bad mental practice. You’ll degrade yourself acting that way. My argument wasn’t “they don’t exist” but rather “their in-game interpretation is really inaccurate with several additions that didn’t exist IRL”.
The issue isn’t “UnFiniShEd ProToTypes” not the argument lol. Literally it’s how accurately you can model something without it being total BS. The IS-6 was only as broken as it was because they used the Mock Up instead of the actual prototype for the armor profile… Literally n because they did a mish mash. If you can’t tell the difference between a real IS-6 vs the on in game? You shouldn’t have an opinion on this conversation and making up points I don’t believe.
Clearly unfinished prototypes aren’t really accepted in game (at least for certain nations) because Panther II, Tiger II 10.5cm, and Coelian all got removed. The Coelian is also based on a mock up. Like the IS-6… The Tiger II 10.5 and Panther II both having things they never had like the Yak 141, IS-6, B3, etc.
What you’ve mentioned are stuff you should bug report lmao and the is6 uses its proposed gun and not what is belived it used
1 Like
And then bug report the issues.
1 Like
Yes a woodern mock up turret. What wasn’t enough for gajin
The 3d model, and armor model is that of the mock up not the actual vehicle buddy, you can go look it up it’s more than “ThE GuN WrOng”. The transmission is wrong, the engine is wrong, the model is wrong, etc. Also do you think I can single handedly fix the entire game with my own bug reports? I’ve made several that’s been accepted in different vehicles and still hasn’t been fixed after 3-5 years. Me reporting all this doesn’t matter. Gaijin doesn’t CARE LOL.
It was enough for Gaijin to model the ENTIRE Is-6 on, not just the “turret” 😆. Selective realism.
Then go and bug report it and try make gajin change it if you believe it’s wrong idk what your so upset over
1 Like
Your clueless and just overly upset there’s actually no point talking to you.
1 Like
You think gaijin doesn’t/didn’t already get bug reports for this? I can’t make repeat bug reports of things already reported that’s stupid asf. I don’t think you know how the game works. Just don’t get mad at me next time before understanding my basic argument and try knowing more about the vehicles you’re getting rowdy about…
“bUg Report it”
Isn’t an argument. It’s been done already buddy. Keep UP.
There’s no point in talking to your bad faith behind either lol. Who cares?
You the only one mad here lmao literally the only upset person
1 Like
You literally went on a tirade saying stuff you made up to get mad about. Creating a straw man argument to just spam bs. Yes that’s annoying to most human beings with a soul. Sorry?
I want to be able to play 1.0 to 3.0 Boats in Enduring Confrontation! I gotta drive my VS-8 and leave mines everywhere like a rat!
2 Likes
Girl what are you on about
Your initial reply where you sounded crazy and on something making up voices. Stuff I’ve never made an argument about :).