ok update,
this is more like a modernized T-80UD turret on modernized T-80B/BV or T-80U hull.
So, better base armor, and new thermals for the PNK-4S
7 Likes
So does our stuff.
Kind of a universal issue right now that msot modern militaries are trying to find a cost effecrive measure for dealing with.
4 Likes
2a6EX please I beg :3
3 Likes
Finally a T-80U mod with relikt lol
1 Like
(pls add both)
6 Likes
2HEL is way less cool
Vk30.01 (p)
7 Likes
Yak 141, IS-6, T-80BVM/90M, etc Syndrome. That’s if they don’t choose selective realism. We far passed historical accuracy.
Idk why you mentioned any of theses lmao as the BVM and 90M are both service tanks and the is6 was a fully finished prototype.
The yak 141 was also a prototype who wasn’t finished due to the Soviet collapse so Gajin used PLANNED armerment this isn’t something new lmao just look at ho229 no prototype of it was fitted with guns.
The f15 active and stol not having weaponry is historically accurate since the plane was ripped of all combat capabilities to suit the new electronics and other systems
3 Likes
did it had a turret?
Why is IS-6 and T-80BVM/90M in the list?
1 Like
Was set to use the tigers but that’s the great part (: it’s a unfinished prototype and already has a suggestion
1 Like
i mean its 50/50 for me tank like this, its 50% made but we don’t know it the tiger turret would work so i don’t know if i want it
Well not exactly a tiger turret I don’t believe but very similar since it was basically the tank that lead to the tiger 1 the tank like any unfinished prototype belongs a place
still this opens the way to a path i dont waht the game follow, was even the turret builded separately? because then everyone will wants their unfinished prototypes
What has always been allowed. There’s never been a issue with unfinished prototypes
The turret was never made and that’s again why it’s unfinished lol the path to unfinished prototypes has been open I mean ho229 v3 was added 12 years ago none of them were armed irl
2 Likes
What I said had nothing to do with there being examples. You’re way too quick and confident about being upset about that statement to realize you don’t know what I am talking about.
The IS-6 3D model is I CORRECT. Armor model INCORRECT. It’s a mish mash of the Mock Up 3D model, plus the engine of one, and a gun that WAS NEVER MOUNTED.
T-80BVM/72B3/90M all having 40 x 40 gun handling without there being explicit proof of such being the case. I remember the system described that could be capable of 40 x 40 handling speeds was the opposite system described by a crew who captured a T-90M… Why are there reports of a different system in those vehicles, and the in game versions having the fast one? I do remember figuring out IT IS A REAL FCS. It was tested on the T-72A on proving grounds. Whether or not it actually made it into the B3, BVM, and 90M all equally in mass? That’s a different discussion.
Yak 141 is well know for having things it didn’t have as a prototype. Meanwhile things like the HSTVL and RDFLT are missing more than they unrealistically have. I think the RDF has maybe 2 things it shouldn’t have that don’t even necessarily make it better in game… My point wasn’t “ThEy DonT ExiSt”
Back to the FCS drives, I’d like to think they’d probably save them all for the BVM or 90M rather than waste it on the B3. They’ve done this with Relikt… The B3 still uses K5 ERA frontally.
So again, I think you’re getting mad about things you simply do not know. Just educate yourself and ask why someone says something. Stop assuming whatever tf soothed your mind. That’s bad faith and bad mental practice. You’ll degrade yourself acting that way. My argument wasn’t “they don’t exist” but rather “their in-game interpretation is really inaccurate with several additions that didn’t exist IRL”.
The issue isn’t “UnFiniShEd ProToTypes” not the argument lol. Literally it’s how accurately you can model something without it being total BS. The IS-6 was only as broken as it was because they used the Mock Up instead of the actual prototype for the armor profile… Literally n because they did a mish mash. If you can’t tell the difference between a real IS-6 vs the on in game? You shouldn’t have an opinion on this conversation and making up points I don’t believe.
Clearly unfinished prototypes aren’t really accepted in game (at least for certain nations) because Panther II, Tiger II 10.5cm, and Coelian all got removed. The Coelian is also based on a mock up. Like the IS-6… The Tiger II 10.5 and Panther II both having things they never had like the Yak 141, IS-6, B3, etc.
What you’ve mentioned are stuff you should bug report lmao and the is6 uses its proposed gun and not what is belived it used
1 Like