You did nothing but argue confidently and not understand the concept of “examples”. Looking up definitions for simple words can help greatly. I can attest to it.
They got their own april fools

Did they just glue a WIFI router antenna to a motorcycle helmet lol?
We are not ready for such power, Do you think the Abrams/T-90/Leopard 2’s have any chance against this?

Still waiting for these gems


And also these
Super panther anything but fixing the turret traverse speed lmao

That’s if they decide to add the gas turbine panther (what there’s not really enough information to say whether it was actually mounted or not
Wasn’t that for tugging and unarmed or am I mistaken?
It was only for tugging
its got internal weapons bays inside the conformal fuel tanks, so it still keeps its 8ish missiles
“Ontos at home”

Argentina slapped 6 recoilless cannons to a Bren carrier.
A Type 74 with more stuff bolted to it? You know with some more info this could be a suggestion as its different to the G model also with infantry some of that metal may stop a RPG.
They proposed weaponizing it but at the end of the day why? Your burning 5 engines and most of Germanys heavy bombers / concepts could hold more bombs on 4 engines (2 with 2 engines bolted together) Though there was a 6 engines the Ju 390 A-1 which would be awesome to see also the pre-war ones that flew but went no where but still they existed.

Heavy bombers are useful for naval as you can lug around heavy bombs that is what the B-52 in game is good at battleship cant handle getting hit by big Vietnam war era bomb.


Because its base protection is superior to the T-80BV

:3
What the f am I even supposed to be looking at?
Its peak :3 a universal carrier with ss.11s










