The YJ-91 part is off due to the red color (note that the same error level appears on the PLA logo), the R-77 doesn’t seem to be photoshop. We tried to find errors in different areas, even magnification and couldn’t see any yet.
I.e.; either this is a Photoshop at levels beyond any possibility of fake detection (AI etc) or a real Photo.
The confusion stems from assumptions made, it’s just a bunch of misunderstanding and misidentifications really. The Sabra “Mk.3” as everyone calls it, was a prototype for the Mk.2 and is depicted above, it came before it and might have been a competitor of sorts. That is the “Mk.3”, and it’s essentially a upgraded Mk.1 in some areas. They’re the same things really lol.
It’s impossible to be AI, as the image got uploaded during 2006 (image ofc is older, but im talking about upload date)
Unless there is some top secret AI that I am not aware of that existed in those times
B-19
F-16 Blk 70 Viper of RoC
Unmanned turret? Looks cool!
Any suggestions about it in the community? It looks like my ideal modern IFV, especially the turret
It’s a pretty old/known variant of BMP-3.
Never checked it before. It’s new to me :)
There is diffrance in performance due to tracks in the game?
Bring strategig bomber mode.
guys check the official channel for next update
if u dont beliece look at the warthunder website
What’s there?
The April Fools blog
Oh, thank you
Man don’t be so serious !
Now they know :(
I am once again asking, nay, begging, for Spyder or HVSD/ADAMs.
I approximate that I have maybe 8 or 9 instances of fighting Su30/34’s in my Machbet left, before I have a mental breakdown.
Thank you.
we’ll probably only see these in 6 months or so, by my guesses the closest thing that we are getting now is the hawk.
but the hvsd/adams should’ve came before since it’s simpler than that, ciws with limited rounds and can easily overheat, 12 km range and slow missile… and i’m in doubt if they would even adapt the missile auto tracking.
