Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 2)

image
MOWAG 6x6 with MLRS

7 Likes

nah that aint happening

Understandable… But they could at least try to fit the gmt-69021 transmission 🥲

apparently, a sabra mk 3?
image

3 Likes

I suggest Su-30 (1992): basically the earlier version of Su-30SM whitout thrust vectoring and (probably) lack of FOX-3 capability.

3 Likes

Looks like Sabra Mk1 with the headlight assembly, armour and merkava 1-3 track set.
Sabra Mk2 has different tracks and headlight assembly.
Sabra Mk3 should have Merkava IV tracks (heavy salt).

AFAIK, heavy salt. Mk3 info is very hard to find. As most of whats available is just based on circular references.

2 Likes

could be a photo shop? the missile’s pylons are missing, and the missile seems on another layer with better resolution
and 59G-105

and a evil idea: ROC also tested M8 AGS in 1995

I checked if it was with noise detectors, and there were no anomalies (note that the image I have posted might have some on the bottom left, but that is because I removed the watermark). Another person did too just incase, and also no anomalies, so it is most likely real. The missile could be mounted in such a way due to R-77’s not being able to be mounted like a normal missile on the J-8DH. The missile pylons are also there, the DH just has less pylons compared to things like the J-8F, where it still has 4 missile pylons.

Also, YJ-91 ARM was already mounted (or seen to be displayed next to) on other J-8’s, the F-8IIM even displaying air to air missiles too.

the adapter seems missing, it’s like the missile is installed direct under wings, too close

That’s a J-8F, which is much different. It does look like there is an adapter, but like I said, the R-77 isn’t mounted like they normally are, as you can see they’re mounted a little titled

Maybe as time goes on someone can post more info if they have, as iirc there was a brochure somewhere talking about some J-8 having the capability to have R-77’s, but I cannot remember it very well

nvm, I just use this random image for example, the adapter is still very strange.

I can only remember some article about J-8IIM mentioned this

That is indeed the “Mk.3”, as is apparent by the turret armor layout. I personally don’t think it should have ever been dubbed Mk.3 as it’s clearly a Mk.1 derivative meant to compete against the Mk.2:
image

3 Likes

image
Wildcat

image
Merlin Commando


Chinook RAF

image
Puma - just retired from service 2 days ago

image
The V Force


TSR’2 - my personal favourite

image
Canberra of the Luftwaffe.

6 Likes

That’s Classified

As if we don’t have aircraft ingame with classified statistics and such gaijin has to make up.

I have submitted an issue, and the administrator says“not enough info”

2 Likes

Did Gaijin made up the Statics for the F-117?

to add a bit more to the confusion,
the following is a Sabra Mark II Early Prototype:

and here is Mark III with Iron Fist:

3 Likes

Swiss upgraded Pz 87 WE

with Barracuda MCS:

(Part of tanks that could’ve been added instead of Leo 2PL and Leo 2A4M in Germany.
Leo 2A4M should’ve gone to UK and 2PL should’ve been reserved for a future Polish/Visgerad tree)

4 Likes

They’ll add/upgrade everything except reverse gears