Okay im gonna bite, lets see:
Finnish 2A6= 25 H/P Strv-122= 24 H/P Ton, difference is almost non existent and due to having same transmission you’re not gonna win any competition against 122 in 2a6
While you gain access to better penetration you loose:
-Armored hull
-More composite on side armor in inner section
-Hull Spall Liner
-Additional Roof Composite armor.
There is a reason why Strv122 is favorite in Swedish tree, trying to make Finnish 2A6 better by claiming it has better firepower is so desperate buddy.
I can tell you never even touched any Leopards from this comment only.
Yeah no chief, go grind other nations.
You do you then.
Britain has no right to access any Leopard by any means.
I also don’t care about your demand Leopards for British tree, deal with it.
Remind me how many of them are 12.7 and how many of them has access to either 1500hp or Best APS ingame that can even intercept KH-38MT and APFSDS?
You want mobility you use Chally2E, you want protection you use Black Night at top tier, simple is that.
Leclerc:576mm
VT4A1:577mm
Russians:580mm
If you’re crying over 16mm penetration then you must have serious issues when it comes to aiming, in that case not even M829A4 gonna help you.
If you have to deal with multiple tanks in such short time while using Challenger then you made a huge mistake already, dont blame Chally in this case.
Now this is fair statement and i agree with that.
Leclerc has similiar mobility that Chally2E has because its transmission is broken, another clueless statement because you never touched it.
Is it? Lets look then:
Seems to much less armored on most common sections.
Also last time i checked Merkava’s didnt have the benefit of having Spall Liners.
Another clueless claim.
Yeah cause you were too busy about crying Challengers 2 with false claims.
