The argument will probably be “thats because thats how israel air force is” well then we didnt really need the israel air tree really
Gripen C, Leopard2A7V KF41
Oh should we be sorry because Italy itself didn’t purchased enough vehicles that are suitable for rank 7?
Do I need you to remind that Israel is even smaller tree overall, haven’t seen you complain about that tho.
Yes on Brasil Air Force, not Italian Air Force, and last time I checked Italian EFT’s wasn’t equipped with CAPTOR-E.
Thats just a lame excuse to stole another nations top tier jet.
You wanna play JAS39E? Go grind the Swedish tree.
1 Like
Dont even start on that one.
MKM was one of the biggest mistake after AH64E fail, its gonna be even worse considering Japan can get Rafale F4 and JAS39E (which shouldn’t be).
Those jets directly purchased by Japan and has even unique modifications done by their companies.
See the difference ?
Then remove all F16s from nations besides the US, Mig29s besides the USSR and so on. Your arguments are invalid the second you mention a subtrees vehicles lol
1 Like
Do you have comprehending issues or jut delibaretly ignoring the point?
Point is that x nation shouldn’t get access to y nations top tier vehicles via sub tech tree.
As long as nation bought the vehicle itself its not problem.
The Leopard 2A7HU is a custom version of the Leopard 2A7 especially for hungary, so it’s not “stolen”
1 Like
Again what i said applies, UK didnt buy the SAAF Gripen, so remove it. Germany didnt buy F-18s, remove them etc etc. Dude subtrees exist for a reason or do you want some nations stuck with outdated and overtiered vehicles that serve no purpose for their BR? Make it make sense
1 Like
so they should remove the BENELUX vehicle by France?
Remove all subtrees is the logic i suppose lol
man, by doing this, there will be much unique vehicle removed :(
Stolen by sub tech tree policy.
Sub tech tree implementation should’ve been unique experience but instead we got multiple same top tier vehicles on different trees.
It basically killed most tech tree’s uniqueness, not C&P at all.
So many nations just become irrelevant
No, remove the end game achievements.
Let me ask you something, what’s the point of grinding Sweden if I can just get access to JAS39E while playing with Italian tech tree?
Or better yet what’s the point of Grinding French top tier if i can just simply get access to Rafale F4 by playing Japan?
Sub tree as a concept was great idea, execution was terrible tho.
1 Like
well, you got the point reguarding the mix of vehicle, beacuse if you play with (for examplle) China at rank IV you can play with the M18 and the IS2 in the same nation
1 Like
Exactly, this whole sub tree implementation is just a mess.
At least I can somewhat accept the China since its divided to two country and mixing them was the only solution.
The point of subtrees is to fill gaps or add diversity to an otherwise stale techtree, or to make it competitive. Its not really gaijins fault that the Gripen is an exported jet and many nations bought it
1 Like
another example, for italy this time, I’ve heard they would add an IS2 at hungarian subtree, now think, playing italy 6.0 with: the M18, the Tigris, the IS2 and the R3 XD
united Korean techtree will be the same all over again until modern era basically lol
Exactly, not making C&P.
They way they handled sub tree implementation was a mess.