They won’t improve the game, let us get more junk at least
Don’t believe so, I think it was only mentioned in text. If you recall a user did find the magazine that it was found in alongside the cage armor photos.
I do wonder if the APDS and L/68 cannon were simultaneous or separate efforts, because if the latter, it means that the APDS could even appear on the existing T-54 we have in-game.
Players _ “make bombers relevant, or stop adding them and instead focus on other usable plane types”.
The Snail - “We hear you. Armed trainers have been popular so we are pleased to announce the…” .
Beech AT-11 Kansan



Ngl this is about the only gen 4 German tank I care about
It just looks like a slightly different B-25
US Government - “This is not a bomber”
US Army Air Corp - “This is not a bomber”
Boeing Aircraft Company - “This is not a bomber”
The Snail - “This is not a bomber”
Player -" This is a bomber"
Boeing Model X-120, aka AT-15


But officially… This is not quite a bomber!

Overlooked this a bunch of times, turns out theirs actually a 14.5 kpvt (from the looks of it) mounted on the front of the ZSU-57-2

The udes xx 20

The strv 103D

The b16

Its like that meme short mig21 model
Not technically a 103D, it’s a 103C as the D model had a new FCS and thermal mount
It’s like that meme short F-8… Oh crap that’s just the A-7, aka the short little ugly f… fella, yeah fella
While I don’t even play the soviet tree, I think it’s weird how there aren’t any TT mid-production KV-1’s. It skips from the earliest KV-1 to a later re-armed model, meaning the most definitive and common iterations of the KV-1 are entirely absent.
KV-1 (Model 1940)
Despite having 3 different T-34’s at 4.0, there is currently no conventional heavy tank at the same BR to compliment them. The KV-1 Model 1940 could fill this niche.
The KV-1 (1940) is much closer to the “definitive” KV-1 that most people would think of when the vehicle is mentioned, which makes its absence slightly odd. It’s not really much different from the current KV-1 (L-11) in stats, but it would get access to a BR-350B APHEBC (and D-350A Smoke), making it more competitive. This would emulate the ammunition progression already seen between the T-34 (1940) and T-34 (1941).
It would functionally be a KV-1E without the applique, as that’s exactly what it is. The KV-1E’s were based off this production model. This means the addition of the Model 1940 would provide Gajin a template for updating the model of the KV-1E’s, without needing to completely remodel them from the ground up.
Some examples that didn’t receive the ekranami modification were upgrade at a later point, introducing the front hull applique or ZIS-5 gun, both of which could be options if Gajin wants to go that route. These could be reserved for squadron vehicles.
KV-1 (Model 1941)
KV-1S at 4.3 isn’t necessarily a proper, conventional heavy tank. The KV-1 Model 1941 could be foldered with it to provide more consistent gameplay to prior vehicles for those who prefer it. This is literally just the current KV-1 (ZIS-5) but with the shorter F-32 gun of the KV-1E. It should get a further expanded ammunition variety, with access to BR-354P APCR and BP-353A HEAT.
Since its essentially the same as the KV-1 ZIS-5, apart from the gun, a newly added Model 1941 can be used as the template for Gajin to update the visual model of the KV-1 ZIS-5.
There is one photographed instance of a Model 1941 with ekranami-style applique welded onto the already reinforced turret, which should provide a cumulative 120 mm of armor. Could be a modification to further distinguish it from other KV-1 variants.
I would also like to see the T-34 (S-54) added around 4.3-4.7, likely foldered with the T-34-57. The S-54 makes more sense as a transitionary gun between the earlier 76 mm guns and later 85 mm guns than the 57 mm gun currently does.
I see the bits but no bobs
Why Israel?
The 2CA2 modification was done by Elbit. Argentina also has strong military ties to Israel for the longest time
T-72A3 lol











