Theeeere, the American simp open his mouth on it again
1 Like
cant even state a fact anymore lol
1 Like
At least I don’t open it to say incorrect info or blocking people from having their nation in game.
Typical American reaction "you guys are bad, we did everything "
“Getting a Canadian tree? Nooooo you guys won’t have it”
2 Likes
Canada should get a tech tree and I don’t care about the others who want to steal our vehicles, we did WWI, WWII,Korea war and yet we are seeing as the weak nation with nothing! The fact that gaijin didn’t added us yet is an insult
1 Like
They are. BAE Systems Inc. is the US subsidiary for BAE, which is a British company. GDLS-C is the Canadian subsidiary for GDLS, which is an American company. They are in the same boat.
Canada is present in the game, through multiple nations mind you, but is still very much present (more so than even some sub trees). Again, Gaijin makes terrible decisions, so it isn’t an official sub tree or TT, but generally their content is spread between Germany and UK. Besides, the US doesn’t need anyone else’s tech, they have plenty of their own which would be pretty damn similar.
This is not an excuse to put the LAV’s that the US DID NOT operate in the US just because “they operate LAV’s more than others”. By this same logic, all vehicles utilizing the LAV chassis should be in the German TT, under the Swiss sub tree, because the LAV is based on the MOWAG Piranha.
2 Likes
did you not read the part about the special agreement that sets it apart?
Please provide me with this “special agreement” as I don’t even know where to begin looking for it, as I have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about.
Alright thank you for providing a source, but now I fail to see where this literally matters with anything we are discussing? Why does this “special security agreement” matter for what we are discussing? How does it change the fact that BAE Systems Inc. is a subsidiary to BAE?
1 Like
LAV-25A2 for USA and Coyote for UK!
🇺🇸 LAV-25A2 Infantry Fighting Vehicle
🇨🇦 Coyote Reconnaissance Vehicle
Bonus Coyote Image
Other vehicles like the LAV 6.0-family should also be added to the UK unless a better home is added for Canadian vehicles.
5 Likes
LAV-25A2 has been sitting in that “passed for consideration” limbo for 3 years now. Free my boy, he ain’t done nothing wrong.
2 Likes
BAE US/UK is more separate than GDLS/GDLS-C so they are not comparable examples
Thanks you a lot!
I still don’t see how this really matters. The BAE website quite literally says that BAE Systems Inc. is a subsidiary of BAE Systems plc. And while GDLS’s website doesn’t explicitly say the same thing, GDLS-C is still considered a subsidiary of GDLS. If anything, the special security agreement just seems more like extra cooperation on business practices, meaning that it isn’t as separate as you make it out to be.
1 Like
I have a sudden need for a googly eyes decoration
1 Like
Same, let me give anything funny googly eyes.
1 Like
I don’t want to seem like the anti fun guy (mushrooms are fine), but they better create an option to turn off things like googly eyes and fire works.
3 years?!? Gaijin is that lazy or they wait for something
it literally says “mitigated our foreign ownership”
