Eh idk, i just find them super ugly looking, Russia imo peaked with the BMPs
the entire BMPT program peaked with the original 2000s prototype/mockup, after that it completely fell off.
Definitely better looking than the moderm ones but still kinda trashy, i think its the chassis imo. The T series chassis being reused feels so lame and the turret imo would look better on a BTR or a BMP
Its like the Namer for me, the reuses of a MBT chassis for a IFV looks ugly personally
The Serbs gave a go as well … inspired by the Terminator but analogous to the Tunguska
5 Likes
Well I mean, there is a similar turret meant for lighter platforms, unrelated program though.
1 Like
Better looking than the BMPT by a large margin
I’d love this as a like, 10.7-11.0 event vic for the soviet tree, would be worth grinding imo.
1 Like
yes, but can it fill up the worse speed bleeding caused by larger wings.
anyway, I wish to see it with RD-33MA(whatever it called, the 1000kgf more thrust version equal to RD-93MA)
and of course the ultimate BMPT
T-15
5 Likes
Shoe tonk
1 Like
AI visualisation of how the PT-17 would look like in-game
Just a note guys, a lot of people are using this method to create fake leaks, so be careful what you trust on the internet
8 Likes
What a ridiculous concept this thing is.
You know what we need? More tank hulls so all of our armoured vehicles use the same insane amount of fuel while offering only a slight increase in capability.
There is a reason no other nation in the world other than Russia and China are using MBT hulls for IFVS/SPAAG
what if they are making these just to be OP in war thunder
1 Like
Oh they will be just that, unkillable from the front side and top
Well Israel as well
and Germans also used Leo 2 hull for Pzh2K
US also considered Abrams hull for other roles like SPAA, same with France
And before that, Patton, AMX-30, Centurion and Leo 1 hulls were used for variety of roles (still used)