Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 2)

“it’s up to date , as well as the leek itself”

yes i’m ware it changed , but this was updated since the release of this update (and had already been before)

now can it just never show up , technecly yes , but this isn’t just 1 vehicle , it’s one whole tech-tree , i would doubt they’d just cancel plans like that.

iran should never be a subtree for Russia

im iranian myself

its hilarious to add iran to russia

these two nations were at war for the past 2 to 3 centuries, russia took many lands from iran, iranians never see russia as friend.

its only government who has (i think) one sided relations with russia.

it is make more sense if you add iran to US than Russia

after 47 years of current government of iran, iranian air force still have much more american jets than russian ones
iranian ground forces have more chieftain than t-72
iranian navy have more western made warships than eastern made

images (3)


2565224

3 Likes

'not the one making the decision’s , 'will see if they indeed do it

USS Indiana (BB-1) would be cool, any config, any year.

3 Likes

In Iran, the Western technological group was already established by 1980, so the Eastern technological group will be weaker.

1 Like

Imagine if Gaijin really went with the idea of giving Iran to UssR,
Imagine … a Soviet F-14 and Chieftain
(Well Kubinka does have captured Chieftain, M60, M109 etc. )

1 Like

Dont have to, considering the existence of Soviet vehicles in “Wester” TTs (ofc as part of Warsaw pact… which is not reflected in the game whatsoever)

1 Like

More T-72 for the USSR!

1 Like

This is just the worst idea ever

2 Likes

I mean, a unified Warsaw Pact tree would be neat (and balances out sim battles at Cold war vehicles eras)… but some nations already being taken as subtrees unfortunately

number of chieftains, m60s and other western tanks still more than russian tanks in iran

also iran is not ally of russia

in recent war between israel and iran and usa we clearly have seen that

if they add iran to russia, many iranians wont be happy to see that

it make much more sense to add IRAQ to russia than any other middle east nation

russia dont need IRAN, may better add some former soviet union nations to russia,

IRAN SUBTREE OF RUSSIA = NONSENSE
(im iranian)

2 Likes

It depends on the source of information, because if you look at everyone’s favorite Wikipedia, you get the feeling that there are about 1,5-2 times more tanks of the Eastern Technological Group

Artesh_Iran_Army_001

m60, m47, chieftain, m113, logistic tank like chieftain bridge and others, more in the army than irgc

most of russian tanks are in IRGC

me myself have seen many Chieftains in the army bases in Khuzestan
(the largest armored division of the army)

anyway, iran as a subtree of russia is ABSOLUTE NONSENSE

It is still better to have a source that more accurately determines the amount of equipment. Yes, the equipment of the IRGC and the Iranian army is combined into one whole, because few people see the difference.

The word “nonsense” is unknown to the developers.

yes its their game, they can do whatever they want but its wrong

maybe its like add vietnam to usa lol or something like that (vietnam want to buy f-16)

We already have Taiwan as part of China, India as part of the UK (India has been independent since 1947 and has no treaties), Germany controls Poland again.

Over kill concept, most Eastern European nations can go separately, and yes the Warsaw Pact concept is not really viable anymore

3 Likes

algeria makes more sense to add to the USSR tech tree as a subtree if we are not having the other USSR states recognized as a subtree/incorporated in to the tree

3 Likes

taiwan china = make sense (they was one single nation about 70 years ago)

india uk = make more sense

poland germany = more more sense

iran russia = bro… they have been fighting each others for the past 3 centuries and still not ally

absolutley