Again that depends if they dont send the MLU up if they give it its correct AIM 9X. Again sweden won’t have effective CAS anytime soon. Maybe Denmark or Norway they might but right now they dont really have anything better than 4 AGM 65
Realistically this also depends on if HARMs are implemented in any decent form and aren’t absolutely trash on release.
PLA Airborne SP Mobile Mortar based on the new airborne platform
the USAF ones have GPS guidance and the Navy ones have active guidance, so they have something to fall back on
damn, wish there was variant of Carnarvon mounting that turret ~ that woulda been an apt stop gap Brit Heavy tank or Conqueror trialing that gun in its original turret before settling for the American 120mm … -~- just wish(history)posting
Mobile mortars are sick
depends if we get agm88b with MMW but i doubt
guess the tank~
Nope, but you’ve A45 F201 Universal Tank prototype alternative development to the A43 Black Prince, with 17pdr gun, before to change for Fv221 Caernarvon Tank with the 20 pdr gun.
it was a wishpost btw
It’s a wish to get it
… Yeah a wish. We want it.
Still hoping we’ll see the Afghan use CV9035 from Denmark.
M10 Booker?
It’s got the track over hang, drivers camera, and CITV
The Tomker
@ NAS Oceana circa 2000
That frame looks like its on the last legs
Latin M50 Ontos wannabe TDs
Peruvian M3 halftrack based with 6x M-65 Instalaza rocket launchers
Argentinian M5 halftrack based with 6x Mod. 68 Czekalski recoilless rifles
USAF F-5E with GBU’s. Could be added as a F-5E (late) variant alongside a ballistics computer and AIM-9L’s
Buddy lasing isn’t ingame (yet), so it wouldn’t be possible atm
Hopefully if we get an F-15C Late we get it with the AN/APG-63(V)3, not the AN/APG-63(V)2. The 63(V)3 is ofc more modern, and would be a lot more future-proof for in-game purposes.
What’s the difference in terms of performance?
