🐌🙏🥺
They really should transfer the early model Striker that’s in the British tree over already, it’s been ages, Like I get the Scimitar is a bit more than a straight copy paste, but the Striker should have been c&ped over immediately.
(And give us a late model striker for the british tree plz)
The Belgian ones had minor mods like Lyran mortars
A direct list of what I would propose? Ok, these are the following units that could becoming the Italian Tech Tree a little better in the next major update.
I will include many units for more choice, obviously it’s impossible to add everything:
- Ground -
- B2 Centauro (105/52).
- B2 Centauro (120/45).
- B1 Centauro Draco.
- OTO Melara Palmaria (ATAK-35).
- OTOMATIC on Leopard 1 hull.
- Creating a folder in the cell of current Lancia 3Ro with 100/17 adding 2 one more versions, one with 90/53 and one with 76/30, unifying all-in-one.
- Autocannone da 102/35 on FIAT 634N.
- Autocannone da 102/35 on SPA 9000, a WW1 truck.
- Ansaldo Carro Cannone Mod.36
- Panzerkampfwagen P40 737 (i), the German-captured version of the P26/40.
- Aircraft -
- Caproni Ca.133 Caprona
- IMAM Ro.58
- G.59-2A
- G.59-4A
- Breda Ba.201
- FC.20 Ter
- SM.93
- Panavia Tornado IT-ECR (Late), recently passed on the forum at the moment when I’m writing.
- Naval -
There’s an interesting phenomenon concerning naval vessels within certain online combat games. While one might expect a dedicated Italian tech tree to be the sole repository for Italian ships, it’s quite common to find numerous Italian vessels distributed across various other nations’ tech trees.
Both the Regia Marina (the Royal Italian Navy before 1946) and the Marina Militare (the Italian Navy after 1946) sols warships at other countries. These purchased versions, even if serving under the Italian flag, often retain their original nation’s designation within the game’s framework.
This means that while they were operated by these other nation, their design and initial construction was actually linked to Italy.
For a deeper dive into specific examples and further details on this topic, please refer to this post for exploring this fact.
Panzer 4 with the panther f “Schmalturm”
I can already hear people saying its “fake” or paper but hear me out, the panzer 4 hull was constructed (obviously), Schmalturm prototypes were built (unlike tiger 2 105 or Coelian turrets), so technically all components that are needed for this were real. Also before saying “it would be too heavy to be functional”, well not really, the added extra weight would make it weigh around 29 tons, similar to the Brummbar, which was real and used an unmodified Panzer 4 transmission and suspension (it did break down a lot tho)
Looks similar to japanese WW2 tanks from the front
For the 10th time, they aren’t the same gun!
you forgot about this:
LM 002 (KBA 25mm)
Or
C13 (25 mm Oerlikon)
Still not acceptable by gaijins rules, as while it is true that both were build, since they have multiple purposes (notmal Pz IV, Schmalturm primarily for the Panther) they dont count as unique parts for this project, as such they dont count as incomplete prototype to that project.
Trust me, if it were acceptable, i would already have suggested it, along with the Einheitspanzer III/IV Ausf.A aka. sloped armor Pz IV.
I was looking at some data, and according to that, this version of the Tornado could carry up to four air-to-air missiles — am I right?
What? I lived in a lie for all this time… Bruh.
I’m sorry if I have published this error, I didn’t was at the current.
I will correct it.
I’m sorry, but I don’t know if it can.
I dabbled in searching everything about this characteristic, but I didn’t found anything, exclusively, regarding the ECR Late.
I’m sorry, but I didn’t know it existed.
Thank you very much for your tribute for this bundle of choices about the next major update. 👍
We literally have the E-100 with a Maus turret…
That vehicle was released before Gaijin changed their implementation guidelines. Iirc