It’s not 12.0 material, it would probably do well at like 9.3-9.7 depending on what ammunition its given (like its DU APDS round). Its RADAR’s are solid where it can detect incoming munitions and lock relatively easy to them and shoot them down and the APDS-T gives it extra range and capability. Not to mention the M940. Pretty sure a couple nations use the Centurion-version.
Well, good luck with that radar.
We currently have a vehicle equipped with Phalanx radars, name is XM246. As for the radars, well, they are c&p of the York radars…
Yeah, maybe max 10.0, but not beyond for just cannon based SPAA. No matter how much lead (and DU) you can spit it would run into two issues: WT code and how ground based radars are modeled. No way Snail gonna autotrack this thing properly, at best just “suggested” radar sights like all radar SPAAs have (which are notoriously inaccurate)
How are you going to compare a RADAR system from the 70’s to its Modernized version which uses an improved RADAR, FLIR, updated auto-tracking, etc. lol.
In all seriousness though the system is quite different now from the XM246 which already is not implemented very well already as you said but the newest version is pretty capable. It’s probably not going to be implemented correctly.
A rare T-72 variant.
A proposed modernization of Libyan T-72’s by UVZ.
Object 172M2L. (T-72M2L?)
Export T-72M/M1(slightly inferior T-72A) upgraded with K-5 on turret cheeks and hull sides, Sosna FCS, DVE-BS Wind Sensor, Tucha smoke launchers and upgraded tracks.
Basically T-72M brought to T-72B3 standard (T-72M3 if you may)