can you at least do this?
Also would you believe me if I told you the fins wanted to replace the 152mm gun on the ISU-152 and turn it into a IFV of sorts?
if you want i can spoiler the whole message so it isnt so big and long
1 Like
Not worth it lol
there thats better
1 Like
It wouldn’t surprise me, Germany did something similar with a Panzer 3 (more of a mobile machine gun nest than anything else)
but an Su-152… did they want to do it because there was a shortage of 152 ammo?
Ps. linked the suggestion for more information
2 Likes
Spoiler
Yet they are still there.
Point stands.
Considered to worse than all Chally 2’s except TES by most of the people.
Huh I guess countless NATO training results and real life conlflicts lies, oh wait they dont.
Both modern Abrams and Leopard2 models are superior than Challenger 2’s in terms of overall capabilities, deal with it.
lol, this claim alone proves that you never touched any Merkava in the first place.
Never thought I see day when a person who didn’t play single Merkava 4 claims he knows better than the person who plays it.
Best gun handling? Even more lmao.
Merkava 4 has 34 degree horizontal rotation and 15 degree elevation with best crew, it doesnt even come close to Leopard2 or T-90M/80BVM that offers 40/40.
Another false claim.
Its completely true because one has better coverage angles and can even stop best A2G munition and APFSDS rounds while other one works only against AGM munitions.
I prefer to have less charges that protects me from anything rather than having average APS system.
Only for those who has having issues with aiming.
I understood it, it seems you’re the one who didn’t.
So am I when it comes to your false claims and constant complains but here we are.
In this case of placements two piece ammunition is better because you cannot ignite the penetrator by simply shooting at it.
This just shows you also have no idea about how two piece ammunition works.
Was stating the facts, didn’t realized you cant even handle that, too bad I don’t care.
Just because something isn’t meta doesn’t mean its bad, learn the difference.
Also so many words for lame excuses.
Yeah, Finland was kinda pushed to the limits with everything.
I own a journal from a engineer who talks about how poor the conditions were for them and how absolutely worthless 90% of Soviet equipment was because it had just been through hell with little to no repairs.
Warped wheels cracked armor, engines missing cylinders or being too unreliable. Hell the Fins hated the BT’s so much the entire Christie Battalion was scrapped after 1 month.
No really time or resources to develop your own equipment, you gotta grab and go, weld and bolt on armor to light vehicles so they can fight much more dangerous and well armored vehicles.
KV-1s were almost always a priority but the Soviet AT guns captured from the Soviets were so poor against heavy armor that most often heavies needed to be knocked out via other heavy armor or prolong the encounter with the enemy to drain them and have the faster units leave the KV-1s behind.
Rare KV-1
Early factory models had 75mm plates on the face, this KV named Millionaire was attacked in September iirc and was essentially stuck after a track was broken and the vehicle left abandoned. The Fins repaired the track and tried towing it but after a few hours of nothing working they made the decision to deny recapture of the vehicle with an explosive charge set near the wheels on the hull.
1 Like
Iirc yes, ammo was a big problem for the Fins but the ISU could also be used as a recovery vehicle
1 Like
That is also a interesting tank, I hadn’t seen that before thank you
1 Like
Spoiler
but not tech tree like the hornets or the adats
most people would be wrong, better firepower and better survivability with similar armor and the same in mostly everything else its not worse by any means
The challenger 2 won iron spear 2023 against both the abrams and leopard
The challenger 2 has the lowest loss rate out of the 3 in the current conflict there in
The challenger 1 scored the furthest tank on tank kill with challenger 2s reported to have scored multiple 5km+ shots in ukraine
the challenger 2 not only won iron spear it was crowned the best nato tank in the world in iron spear
just as an example
27 out of 31 abrams were lost in ukraine
41 out 80 leopard 2s were lost in ukraine
2 challengers out of 14 were lost in ukraine
i can look at the xray to get the info i need
so? faster than the challengers
no just in general
no im very aware of that and yes i do know how 2 piece ammo works im not an idiot like you keep implying, (the ammo placement is still worse)
your not stating facts your just being a moron
“learn the difference” after i just told you the challengers my favourite mbt to play? your a funny one
F-35 ground?
4 Likes
F-35A as ground force suggestion
4 Likes
Well spotted, was working on a ground vehicle at first but had problems with sources for it
2 Likes
why ground ?
because the BWP-2000 is an ifv
i mean why f35 in ground ?
I hope he’s doing well