LRF on the mantlet?
🇿🇦 Denel Badger Variants
- The Section variant armed with a 30mm EMAK 30 autocannon.
- The Anti-tank variant armed with 4x ZT3A2 Ingwe ATGM’s.
Note: I’m pretty sure there’s a variant with the 30mm and ZT3A2 missiles. The fire support variant maybe? Hope for some more insight from anyone.
6 Likes
The LCT 30/ZT3 is mounted on the AV8 (Turkish company but in Malaysian service) and the Rooikat.
2 Likes
I thought there was one prototype Badger that had that turret on it but I could be mistaken.
M1A2SEPv3s with FP kit mounts but without ARAT installed.
2 Likes
Make them a researchable module, like Kontact-1 ERA on some of the Soviet tanks
1 Like
SLAMRAAM for USA
Swedish IRIS-T SLS system and Finnish ItO 96 (BUK M1) for Swedish tree.
Any of the million ground based IRIS-T systems for Germany.
Something for France
Spoiler
IDK
Brits
Land Ceptor maybe if its independent?
1 Like
well damn, it looked very interesting for the game.
Isnt Buk a bit overkill range wise for now? (maybe later tho)
35km Horizontal and 22km max alt.
Not that much of a jump from pantsir, considering Buk M1 has no guns and only 4 to go missiles.
But in any case, it would not be anywhere near as unbalanced as pantsir is now.
At least, Germany (East), Britain (India), Italy (Hungary), USSR and Sweden (Finland) could get it, so it would not create such a power imbalance as pantsir is.
Well, it is higher than max 20km and guaranteed 15-18km of Panstir, but yeah, giving to practically everyone and lack of guns would balance out. It still leaves the issue of low altitude attackers, but that is the issue for everyone on top (except Russia and, ironically, Italy via Otomatic)
Yes, it has a E/O sight that can be used to fire and guide the missile.
The smaller mast
3 Likes
+1 For Brits getting it then.
1 Like
bigger mast is meant for data link?
3 Likes