Yeah I don’t remember if the L/68 was recorded in image or not
Does “Everything except tech trees” suggest we are not talking about new crap?
…
Maybe things like
…Make any top mounted machine gun require a man on it like the M18 or option it off.
…Let me decide which rack to put my ammo in.
…Let me reload a different shell without firing one
…Add fuel to ground
…If you field an airplane in line up, make it present at the airfield before you have the sp opening it up for bombing from strat bombers.
I’m not sure how many of these are already in this topic. But after reading for about 15 mins … .I’ve seen mostly suggestions for more crap. Stop adding stuff. Change your revenue model and make what you have more interesting :P
2 Likes
Yes, please. Let’s nerf the Abrams some more :D
Fuel would be an Interesting mechanic. Also i don’t get that mandatory airfield spawn why isn’t a thing in ground RB.
2 Likes
They won’t improve the game, let us get more junk at least
Don’t believe so, I think it was only mentioned in text. If you recall a user did find the magazine that it was found in alongside the cage armor photos.
I do wonder if the APDS and L/68 cannon were simultaneous or separate efforts, because if the latter, it means that the APDS could even appear on the existing T-54 we have in-game.
Players _ “make bombers relevant, or stop adding them and instead focus on other usable plane types”.
The Snail - “We hear you. Armed trainers have been popular so we are pleased to announce the…” .
Beech AT-11 Kansan
4 Likes
Ngl this is about the only gen 4 German tank I care about
3 Likes
It just looks like a slightly different B-25
US Government - “This is not a bomber”
US Army Air Corp - “This is not a bomber”
Boeing Aircraft Company - “This is not a bomber”
The Snail - “This is not a bomber”
Player -" This is a bomber"
Boeing Model X-120, aka AT-15
But officially… This is not quite a bomber!
1 Like
Overlooked this a bunch of times, turns out theirs actually a 14.5 kpvt (from the looks of it) mounted on the front of the ZSU-57-2
6 Likes
The udes xx 20
The strv 103D
The b16
10 Likes
Its like that meme short mig21 model
1 Like
Not technically a 103D, it’s a 103C as the D model had a new FCS and thermal mount
It’s like that meme short F-8… Oh crap that’s just the A-7, aka the short little ugly f… fella, yeah fella
1 Like
Armata und T-62M obr.2022 at Omsk
1 Like
Glimpse of 2026 T-72A with Relikt (T-72AM? T-72A obr.2025/26?)
limited info as of now
1 Like
2026 Ru T-64 with K-5 ERA on turret front (and other bits n bobs added)
1 Like
While I don’t even play the soviet tree, I think it’s weird how there aren’t any TT mid-production KV-1’s. It skips from the earliest KV-1 to a later re-armed model, meaning the most definitive and common iterations of the KV-1 are entirely absent.
KV-1 (Model 1940)
Despite having 3 different T-34’s at 4.0, there is currently no conventional heavy tank at the same BR to compliment them. The KV-1 Model 1940 could fill this niche.
The KV-1 (1940) is much closer to the “definitive” KV-1 that most people would think of when the vehicle is mentioned, which makes its absence slightly odd. It’s not really much different from the current KV-1 (L-11) in stats, but it would get access to a BR-350B APHEBC (and D-350A Smoke), making it more competitive. This would emulate the ammunition progression already seen between the T-34 (1940) and T-34 (1941).
It would functionally be a KV-1E without the applique, as that’s exactly what it is. The KV-1E’s were based off this production model. This means the addition of the Model 1940 would provide Gajin a template for updating the model of the KV-1E’s, without needing to completely remodel them from the ground up.
Some examples that didn’t receive the ekranami modification were upgrade at a later point, introducing the front hull applique or ZIS-5 gun, both of which could be options if Gajin wants to go that route. These could be reserved for squadron vehicles.
KV-1 (Model 1941)
KV-1S at 4.3 isn’t necessarily a proper, conventional heavy tank. The KV-1 Model 1941 could be foldered with it to provide more consistent gameplay to prior vehicles for those who prefer it. This is literally just the current KV-1 (ZIS-5) but with the shorter F-32 gun of the KV-1E. It should get a further expanded ammunition variety, with access to BR-354P APCR and BP-353A HEAT.
Since its essentially the same as the KV-1 ZIS-5, apart from the gun, a newly added Model 1941 can be used as the template for Gajin to update the visual model of the KV-1 ZIS-5.
There is one photographed instance of a Model 1941 with ekranami-style applique welded onto the already reinforced turret, which should provide a cumulative 120 mm of armor. Could be a modification to further distinguish it from other KV-1 variants.
I would also like to see the T-34 (S-54) added around 4.3-4.7, likely foldered with the T-34-57. The S-54 makes more sense as a transitionary gun between the earlier 76 mm guns and later 85 mm guns than the 57 mm gun currently does.
6 Likes