could see that coming
we have leopards, abrams and K2, I don’t think they really care lol
sounds like a logistical nightmare.
its not that baddddddddddddddd
Depends on what Kosiniak says,
And if Kamysz listens to him.
3 different tanks lol.
the only commonality would be the ammo for their machine guns
you would be surprised that they share more than that
Let me pull out some post soviet tanks, there should be a few in a shed somewhere.
Crew incompetence ;)
across the 3? there are differences in the guns and i dont think American APFSDS for the abrams is cleared for the L/55 and the other way around
Cleared? Whats that? If it fits it goes :P
they shouldve just stuck with the Abrams lol. its actually built for combat
The Abrams uses a license built Rh120 L/44. That thing has a lower pressure chamber than the newer Rh120 L/55 on the leopards 2A6 onwards (or was the new chamber only on the L/55A1?). In either case, any ammo that an Abrams can fire, can be fired by any leopard as well. But the Abrams can’t fire the newer DM73 rounds that are built with the higher pressure chamber in mind.
Serval DSA and 30mm DSA finalizing testing and being brought into production soon!
If only there was a french shorad turret on the ebrc jaguar chassis.
like the skyranger mistral turret.
I mean we already got the MiG-17PF Fresco D why not add the F-86H Saber Hog I don’t care if it comes as a Squadron/Event vehicle or a prem
I just want it in the game
this
a CTA 40 with proxy fuze and some mistrals would be a decent AA, add in a small radar while you’re at it
Unfortunately, the french doctrine revolves around a multiple vehicle approach
CTA 40 doesn’t have proxy fuse rounds, it uses programmable air-burst