how abt khanjali tank from gta5 :) ?
That’s a GTAV: Online update content. Not the main GTA:V world content.
But yea, they did fix tracks for that.
Type 97 te-ke tankette.
It could equip a 37mm cannon, so it should be strong enough right?
Tucker Tiger Tank
Featuring a semi-automatic 37 mm anti-aircraft/anti-tank gun in an electronically-powered turret with 75-degree elevation.
were these the strike-only F-4s or did they have A2A Armament?
Anything is stronger than the American 50 cal tank, and the French gaijin doesn’t even let new players play
Mysterious Israeli light tank with a 120mm made around the same time as the Merkava 4, not much info on it other than the photo and a mention in some memoirs. Has the same 650hp engine as the Azcharit but with the radiator under the fighting compartment. Also has torsion bar suspension.
Since there’s essentially no info on it I doubt it will be added but it would be a nice way to get a higher tier light vehicle for the israeli tree.
It’s a shame all the F4 variants can’t be in one lineup. If you could bring all of them together it would certainly be a phantom menace.
F-4E with DMAS upgrade would be good tbh
AIM-7F and AIM-9M with other minor upgrade
They were tested with air-to-air missiles, and the same airframes used air-to-air missiles when they entered Greek service.
PARS ALPHA 6×6 Fire Support and Reconnaissance Vehicle

- This vehicle features a Cockerill 3030 Turret armed with a 30mm MK44 Bushmaster.


Further Contenders…
🇬🇷 M113 w/ SAMSON Mini Remote Weapon Station
- Summary:
- A Hellenic Army M113A1 (or maybe the M113A2) equipped with a SAMSON Mini Remote Weapon Station made by Rafael. This was introduced at DEFEA 2025 as part of the IFV tender to modernize up to 500 M113 APC’s.
- Armament:
- Autocannon - 30mm M230LF
- Fires M789 HEDP and M799 HEI rounds primarily.
- Anti-tank Guided Missile - Spike-LR
- Autocannon - 30mm M230LF
- Estimated BR: 9.0-9.3
- Equipped with the latest thermals/auto-tracking, a 30mm with HE rounds, and FnF anti-tank missiles however, still an M113-platform with no APFSDS-T or APDS-T rounds and limited ammo capacity.
- Absolute helicopter/slow aircraft destroyer.
- 30mm limited effectiveness against armor, same munitions used on the Apache.
- At least 2x ATGM’s ready-to-fire, possibly 2x additional stored inside.
- Armament:
- A Hellenic Army M113A1 (or maybe the M113A2) equipped with a SAMSON Mini Remote Weapon Station made by Rafael. This was introduced at DEFEA 2025 as part of the IFV tender to modernize up to 500 M113 APC’s.
- Notes:
- I can’t make out the sight, almost like a MiniPop or Sight-25H which are both high-resolution EO/IR optics with auto-tracking, thermal channels, and integrated Laser Rangefinder.
https://defence-blog.com/rafael-unveils-upgraded-m113-for-hellenic-army/?amp
Bonus:
- Additional information was shown at DEFEA 2025 for the Hellenic Army’s potential Leopard 1A5 modernization:
- Displayed is the potential armor kit by EODH.
- Representations of the Leopard 1A5HEL with complete modernization by EODH.
Not being known to carry weapons is different from being able to carry weapons. You never did follow up on what you ended up clarifying with the suggestion mod (or was it a tech mod? I dunno), what did they say? I mean, no evidence exists that suggests it was gutted and lost the ability to use weaponry, why would it be presumed it can’t use any. To me personally it seems like an illogical conclusion due to the lack of evidence and documentation surrounding the vehicle and its development. At the end of the day it was an IAF Kurnass, and without any information that proves the weaponry it did use can’t be used anymore I find it hard to believe the idea it can’t use any weaponry at all. It very well may have been gutted in a way to even further improve its flight performance more so than it already was for the purpose of demonstration, but again the proof is yet to be seen. It was still capable of mounting pylons and armament, so we know that much, but yes being able to use said mounted armament is different.
Keep in mind, it still has a gun too :)))
by extension, the whole J-10 series (J10B, TVC, C, etc.)
A more expansive and balanced naval roster would enrich gameplay by ensuring that every nation has access to a diverse array of modern warships. This approach would help maintain parity in combat effectiveness, giving players a broad spectrum of choices that reflect historical and contemporary advancements in naval warfare.
Additionally, introducing submarines into the mix would revolutionize naval engagements by adding an entirely new dimension to tactical gameplay. Their inclusion would create dynamic interactions between surface vessels and submerged threats, offering subchasers and destroyers an essential role in counter-submarine warfare. Players commanding these vessels would engage in strategic anti-submarine operations, utilizing sonar, depth charges, and specialized weaponry to hunt and neutralize enemy submarines, fostering high-stakes cat-and-mouse encounters.
This expanded naval ecosystem would bring fresh strategic depth to the game, encouraging players to adapt their tactics and coordinate across different ship classes. The addition of submarines could also necessitate the introduction of new mechanics, such as underwater acoustics, periscope-based spotting, and torpedo evasion maneuvers, further enhancing immersion and complexity.