should considered range, irl ammo test usually happens in 1000m or 2000.
APFSDS declines slower than APDS
1 Like
Ik but that’s the thing, I don’t think USA has sent 25mm APFSDS since that’s DU
The bmp in the test was a standard BMP3 with no additional armour.
But there are different types of up-armoured models:
This is with the 2S24 ERA (BMP-3 Cactus!):
And these models do fire 30mm APFSDS-T as well
2 Likes
BMP-80 ahh
they MBTed the BMP
It has a considerable amount of protection, and they have been used in Ukraine as well
ah yes, the BTR-24
I’d imagine any enemy infantry/tanks would be suffering from a significant emotional event if that thing opens up on their position
infantry yeah. tanks could probably take them as long as it isnt coming down on them at a steep angle
true, but anything outside the interior of the tank would be toast:
Barrel, sensors, scopes, tracks, turret ring (unlikely but possible) etc.
Also its a bit like the T90M that got blinded by the Bradley, that can happen to any MBT
1 Like
it got fully clipped by superior bushmaster bc gunner locked in on WT
1 Like
yeah i saw that too, but idk if he was making it up to take a jab at Russia or smth.
honestly he could be serious. WT does represent those general flaws in the T series, though iirc they should be popping turrets a lot more
1 Like
In game or irl?
in game. no blowout panels, turret set up so if hit in ammo, it blasts upwards, should be popping every dart shot to the ammo
oh, well that depends on RNG mostly
then they should make it more consistent, hot spall and dart impact will set off proplellant charges and HE/HEAT shells, even more on DU munitions which are unfairly held back
Make a recommendation then
there is probably one already for DU ammo
ok then