no absolutley not, we dont need the f15I+ its pointless becauseit would be a worse ia, f15i late is really a poinless addition also the version ingame should be using satcom and elsira electronic warfare protection suites. also the argument that the f15IA coming in 2030 isnt a good point, by the rate we are advancing in modern aircraft it will be expected that he f15IA comes early 2026
it fits just under barakII c at br 14.3
Why, that’s where the F-35I belongs, the Sufa is a two seater and logically should follow the F-16D??
There is no such thing as the ‘I+’, however, I and other people who actually care about the future of the Israeli air tree think it necessary to add as many variants of jets as possible, especially if they are ACTUALLY unqiue unlike the F-15I we have in game.
Your protesting to the addition of more israeli aircraft just shows you don’t actually care and simply wanted the easy grind, which is just disappointing
1 Like
us marines use them
am protesting agaisnt useless additions andf15I late is one of them , i would rather get unique planes like fouga magister,f35I,F16i sufa,f15IAkfir-2000,lavi,mig 2000,f15D baz meshpar
1 Like
maybe yes, sufa under f16D barak
1 Like
British Chaffee pls. I desire more lend-lease for the UK(especially around BRs like 3.7 where unique has already been added for the most part)
6 Likes
Fair enough.
Id also like to see the ACV-30, ideally they put it on ACV 2.0 hull so it can swim faster
TAM VCA, Marder with 155mm
11 Likes
🇮🇱 ATMOS 2000, Next Generation SPH
- The Israeli ATMOS 2000 is a relatively new system that’s armed with a 155mm cannon that can be mounted on multiple types of heavy duty trucks, allowing for quick deployment and adaptability. Per the manufacturer, it is capable of direct fire. Would be a good glass cannon for Rank V. The only issue would be what chassis/platform Israel fully accepts into service, as in, the vehicle needs self-storage for ammo. Some vehicles do have this capability for at least minimum storage.
4 Likes
seems like an odd choice. Is there a reason why Russia wont put a T-90M turret on a T-80BVM hull?
The issue with the T-80BVM hulls is there is only so many of them. They’re almost out of T-80’s as a whole (saying this in a completely apolitical manner) so using a T-90M hull with a more common T-72B3 turret might be an economic decision. If they start production of T-80’s again instead of retrofitting older hulls, it could be different.
5 Likes
different autoloader, T-80 Shares an autoloader with T-64, but T-72 & T-90 use a different one that’s a little more simple to produce, but has different mounting points, T-72 on to T-90 should be pretty much plug and play, T-90 on to T-80 would require more expansive integration. + what Yontzee said.
5 Likes
I am curious about its designation, if it even has one. T-90M3? I don’t know lol.
