oom1992
April 14, 2024, 6:01pm
4225
I predict another targeting pod on aviation at rank VII ~ VIII for second, third and fourth quarter major update in this year
AN/AAQ-28(V)3 Litening ER
AN/AAQ-25(V)4 Litening AT (F-16C Blk.40 Barak, F/A-18C MLU 2, F-16AM MLU (FAP & RNLAF), F-16CG Blk.40)
Rafael Litening III (AMX A-11B, AMX A-1, JAS39 Gripen C/D, F-16C Blk.52+ (RSAF), EF-18+ Hornet (SASF), F-16C Blk.50M (FACh), F-5EM (FAB), Eurofighter Typhoon F Mk.2 (RAF), Eurofighter Typhhon FGR.4 (RAF), Eurofighter Typhoon Tranche 1~3, F-16I Sufa, M-346FT)
AN/AAQ-28(V)8 Litening G4 (F/A-18D (USMC)(2022), F-16AM MLU (RDAF), AV-8B+ (2014),
AN/AAQ-13 navigation pod (F-16CG Block 40/42 & F-15E)
AN/AAQ-20 Pathfinder navigation pod (F-16A Block 20 MLU, F-15I Ra’am)
AN/AAS-38 Nite Hawk (F/A-18A & F/A-18C Hornet, EF-18 Hornet)
AN/AAQ-33 Sniper XR (F-16CM Block 50, F-15E (2014 ~ present), CF-18 HEP, FA-50 Block 10 & Block 20)
AN/AVQ-26 Pave Tack (F-4E (ANG), F-111C (RAAF), F-111F)
AN/AVQ-10 Pave Knife (F-4E Block 50, F-4D)
AN/AVQ-11 Pave Sword (F-4D)
1 Like
An update including the Scorpion Kastet and Fox Milan (from what I remember, the Milan launcher could be added to the standard RARDEN turret too) would be lovely. Even if the Fox Milan still needs the new turret, it’d still be a strong addition.
France could join in with the wheely fun with variants of the VBL and VCR, too. Lohr VPX and RPX, as well.
It is armored warfare concept variant, it isnt real
2 Likes
With a 7.62 it would be equally scary, MILANs may be bad, but if its 7.3 ish i cant see why not.
Lmao. I’m shaking in my boots😂
About the MG, not the Milan’s. Even though the Milan’s don’t do jack diddily
With the current Fox that is forced to flank to even deal damage generating so much salt, a variant that allows it to hurt almost everything frontally at 7.3 will generate a ton of gnashing teeth and rage.
Knowing people, they’d demand it to go up to 8.7+ BR just as “revenge” for the 7.0 Fox.
I still want it, the salt will be phenomenal.
It could be a TDU-11/B…
It seems to be missing both the rocket head and back-mounted flares.
1 Like
Miraz05
April 15, 2024, 6:55am
4234
It must be a rocket pod with its nosecone
NCC105
April 15, 2024, 7:15am
4235
yes, but what rocket, I don’t remember anything like this.
I managed to find a higher res copy, I swear its got the rollerons of a sidewinder on the fin tips
It would be entirely useless with no combat ability, a free kill.
1 Like
Miraz05
April 15, 2024, 12:08pm
4239
FFAR I think. It should be same as the other rocket pods that dont have the nose cone.
Miraz05
April 15, 2024, 12:59pm
4240
Is this rocket compatible with the AIM-9B launch rail?
Okay kinda…might go in the ground tech tree?
5 Likes
