i do agree with your point , but disagre with the reason behind it
Not looking to argue on what you want to call the “thing” you have. I know how defensive people get on this subject.
I want the option to opt out of crossplay the same way you do, it’s only fair.
To be fair, in WT it doesn’t matter as Gaijin makes the vehicle work perfectly fine, while in IRl, the vehicles could be a total failure. Like Mig 9 and Mig-27 would kill it self in game thanks to their guns. On both planes the guns when fired, not only it teared up the fuselage on the plane, but in the case of Mig-9 even hurt the pilot himself. In Mig-27 it was because the huge fire rate. And there are much more cases. Stg. York M247 was a total failure of a project.
But together…we can be strong. To be fair Polis-Czechoslovakia TT would be wet dream.
Yes! The Swedish tiger 2. I’ve always wanted one ever since I saw that video on YouTube.
Yea I like the idea of a rare event Swedish Tiger II … but the problem is with some other Nations
USSR tested the most out of their captured Tiger IIs, hence “most used”
After them comes France, who even still has the only working Tiger II in the world
Also US captured a few …
So, if we can ignore these regarding the major nations, then we can think of bolstering Swedish tree with a rare event Tiger II (no not premium and definitely not squadron)
IMHO, tested/evaluated vehicles should be rare event vehicles, not premiums
There you go)))))))
did they use it
A Leopard 2A7 with MCS arrived in Vilnius for Lithuanian Independence Day
Lithuania is planning to equip its army with Leopard 2A8
Lithuania joins Czech Republic, Sweden, Italy and the Netherlands for Leopard 2A7/A8 Aquisition
Maybe then we can see the Lanc actually get a decent buff if it goes to Russia.
Please give us a separate timer setting for guided and unguided bombs.
There are aircraft equipped with guided and unguided bombs, and guided bombs require less time than unguided ones.
makes you wish you bought rheinmetall shares. Now the value is nearly 5 times as much as in 2022
For Things like PT-91 and T-72M2, I think it’s fine, at least they are based on USSR vehicle, have some relationship.
Things like Pandur II, related to Austria, so German is acceptable.
But for things have complex tech source or be independent, my idea is to wait for suitable TT to get in.
French M47 and Italian M60 should be in standard tech tree. These were the main MBTs of these nations during the respective time periods.
I fleetingly told one of my friends to buy shares in Rheinmetall when the unnamed conflict began, he was very very satisfied and I mortified when he told me just how much he had spent on an offhand comment.