It was not serviced, it was used as target practice.
In that case then its somewhat iffy, it was bought I suppose. I wouldn’t be opposed it what i’m trying to say, but better if something else can be found.
There’s an argument to be made for it, but it’s indeed questionable and divisive.
Which was partially not built at all?
Don’t worry, he just doesn’t want the precious German panzers to leave the tree
At least there was a chassis, and in one of the projects they wanted to put a turret from a centurion on it. As you understand, Sweden has both things.
Considering also that the source you attached says that the tank was given free of charge for testing, and not purchased:
Spoiler
Makes sense
Key word of wanted.
Improved Lu Dun-35 35mm Gun & Missile Integrated Weapon System
Now with 4 SAM launchers instead of 2 along with the single-barrel 35mm rotary autocannon
Nah sweden has already to many exceptions compared to other trees. If we now add vehicles which were just for armor testing then most ww2 nations could get every tank.
Sweden can just get a finnish kv1 to have a heavy tank
Yeah, I am also someone who doesn’t like the idea of a Swedish Tiger II, but I find that it wouldn’t be the worst offender when it comes to vehicle additions/exceptions
I was gonna add that Sweden already gets anything they happened to glance at in passing
yea, then US mains might contest that with the US’ captured Tiger II
IF Sweden indeed needs it, make it a super rare event vehicle at least
… and Israel with the captured Egyptian IS-3 ?
Reasonable number of Panzergrenadier Puma IFV (VJTF variant) fitted with the MELLS (aka Spike LR) launcher.
Gaijin. when?
2 years from now, cause they can never add things on time
Or fix it case with the PUMA
Even the option to just unmount MUSS would be great, just to make it less tall