Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 1)

Gap filler copium.
IS-3
Israel captured 3 IS-3M heavy tanks at one point from the 6 day war (can’t remember exact conflict but should be 6 day war if I recall) in perfect condition, and subsequently put them into service. However they were used as indirect fire platforms. At the time, they were the most heavily armored tanks in service.

(Technically speaking, TONS of T-34-85s were also captured, but merely as trophies and never entered actual service. Archers (the backwards British boi) and apparently SU-100s and supposedly SU-152 were also captured. None entered service, but most were used in crates are targets for target practice it seems…)

1 Like

Granted. F-15 Added.
-Gaijin

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/860826937382928384/1207237809983856650/image0.jpg?ex=65deead3&is=65cc75d3&hm=209418977564627b7476606ac101745a2651c801b7017d119423152601cb5316&
Child sized MBT-2000

2 Likes

What for? The tank was in disrepair, it had no shells (it was difficult to find them), the engine and turret rotation were broken. This is even worse than Kranvagn

If it was purchased by Sweden then I don’t see why not, its not a captured vehicle and was accepted into service from what I’ve read. It shouldn’t be an issue.

1 Like

We don’t have aim assist, we have auto tracking against one selected target, which doesn’t help you to aim, it just slews the camera, meanwhile PC players can fly with keyboard and keep track of several targets at once by free-looking with the camera, you can also fly one direction, and HMD a missile in another, which controller players can’t do.

But if you insist, we will happily take Console only lobbies, at least then there’s nearly no chance of cheating, makes flying easier too.

It was not serviced, it was used as target practice.

In that case then its somewhat iffy, it was bought I suppose. I wouldn’t be opposed it what i’m trying to say, but better if something else can be found.

1 Like

There’s an argument to be made for it, but it’s indeed questionable and divisive.

1 Like

OSA-76
Equipped with the 76 mm ZIS-3 field gun

image004

2 Likes

legacy BTR-82A gets “new” Kornet ATGM mount

4 Likes

but failed to induct BTR-87 with four Kornet launchers in the Army

4 Likes

Which was partially not built at all?

Don’t worry, he just doesn’t want the precious German panzers to leave the tree

1 Like

At least there was a chassis, and in one of the projects they wanted to put a turret from a centurion on it. As you understand, Sweden has both things.

Considering also that the source you attached says that the tank was given free of charge for testing, and not purchased:

Spoiler

image

Makes sense

Key word of wanted.

Improved Lu Dun-35 35mm Gun & Missile Integrated Weapon System
Now with 4 SAM launchers instead of 2 along with the single-barrel 35mm rotary autocannon

6 Likes

Nah sweden has already to many exceptions compared to other trees. If we now add vehicles which were just for armor testing then most ww2 nations could get every tank.

Sweden can just get a finnish kv1 to have a heavy tank

6 Likes

Yeah, I am also someone who doesn’t like the idea of a Swedish Tiger II, but I find that it wouldn’t be the worst offender when it comes to vehicle additions/exceptions