Nah what you have here is a different one.
Its “164” plane IIRC. Has different engines compared to this.
Its also a further development of La7 but it has different engines. Also thanks to somewhat good success on it there were developments of La9 version with two jet engines whcih was designated 138.
2 Likes
Spoiler
![i_013|400x500]
(upload://yvNNNEwl7CY4rLVSAJYu9SgAqVX.jpeg)
120R
basically 120 but it has a rocket engine.
This image is a comparision of serial La-7 with three B-20 guns, 120 and 120R (which are further developments of La-7, R version having rocket engine with standart engine.)
lol damn give this guy an award.
TG-1
(Tank Grote 1)
Soviet experimental heavy ( i think) tank from 1931.
As event vehicle, coupled with other prewar prototypes in an crafting even with you being able to choose which you want to get in the end.
Spoiler
2 Likes
SO-122
Yugoslavian attempt at putting 122 A-19 (featured on ISU-122 in game) cannon into a Sherman.
Spoiler
6 Likes
This is IL-40, though im unsure if i mentioned it already or not so sorry if I am doing it again or repeating it.
IL-40P had no trouble flying.
Why im talking of Il-40P again ?
Because i found photo of it carrying TRS-132 and TRS-212.
Im pretty sure it could carry S-1 rockets as well but i have no phtoso of that.
3 Likes
As well as having a T-34 engine :D
1 Like
It has new style turret however im not sure it had it installed, it was for sure proposed. V2R engine, which i think doesnt havw much different from V-2.
Not saying im against it having it, just unsure if it was installed or proposed.
The prototype was finished and had a functioning new turret
Yes but did it have V-2 in the end?
The engine?
Yes, as the SO-122 was based on the M-634 rather than a base M4A3E4.
M-634 was an M4A3E4 but with T-34 engine, the SO-122 was a further modification of this.
2 Likes
BAe EAP/ACA: Formerly denied, I proved it works so I’d like to see that for the UK’s next addition.
Link: The British Mini-Typhoon the BAe EAP - #18 by Rileyy3437
Tanks made after the year 2000 should gst bino thermals. Seripusly if i can get 2 day shipping on a thermal monocular then i shpuld be able to use thermals in bino view without needing the CITV.
1 Like
Bino Thermals would be too OP I think
Not if theyre low quality and of a lower max zoom.
IA-63 Pampa 2000 (USA)
We need this as a modification
9 Likes
Would kinda make it more of tank destroyer because of limited fire angles.
That would probably be alright if there was a turnout mechanic, so the commander had to be vulnerable using it.
Praga went to USSR also and it still had no connection to it. Only connection that it had was that we were occupied by Soviets…and Lithuania was sadly part of USSR. This is what i think will be the sad reality.