Can someone explain the differences between the boxer and patria? Every time i see these two i think theyre the same chassis.
First thing that comes to my mind is the Boxer having “mission modules”, while the Patria has modular turrets.
Here’s a Boxer without a module.
Boxer is german, patria is finnish
Thats about all i know
Ah ok
I can tell them apart most of the time, but I can’t really explain why.
One feature that immidiately stands out though is the placement of the driver vision ports.
In Boxer the driver is positioned on the right hand side.
In Patria, the left hand side.
I don’t have much information, from what I can get, it planed to used 6td-2 or gas turbine product “29G”, with different transmission, no mention of 5TDF. But as it’s never fully completed, it’s a good choice to see a completed one in Warthunder. But as long as the armor can be penetrated, 152mm is acceptable, even as a modification, bringing both version to game.
By the way, I choose object 490a instead of 477, because 152mm gun and 1200mm armor is far too much for other tanks, and obj.490a’s turret is cool.
always up for more WW2 stuff, there is a lot of vehicles they can still add for low tier
Kun Wu missile (Taiwanese copied 9M14 ATGM) on a jeep
You should make a suggestion post on it.
Modern equivalent of Archer.
A-4M please snail
For germany the argentinian (fma iae 33 pulqui ii) since argentina is essentially a subtree for germany.
And for britain and germany the hal hf24 marut. Germany could get the mk1 and britain could get the mk1r.
I wonder why :)
Well most of their tanks are german designed. Even the turret on the tam VCTP is used on other german prototpes of the time. Mainly the Puma ACV 25mm mauser variants.
Isnt Aim-9P-4 something like little aim-9L with 9L being the better one. What are the differences between them?