I think they need to seperate ships from aircraft at around br 7.3 and add split br’s which would be a great change to naval, ground and air all simultaneously. Furthermore, the issue with WW1 ships is horribly apparent as they just don’t have the AA to compete even with early WW2 aircraft.
I think the BR system is over-compressed but I understand why that is because of a lack of players, however with an update to the UI, in addition to new ships with legacies (Waspite, Bismarck, Colorado, Nagato etc), submarines and faster progression, it could become a much more popular mode. But as of current you have CL’s fighting BB’s and BC’s and it just doesn’t work unless its something like Von der Tann, Invincible etc.
Iowa and Yamato it would depend on their br’s, maybe Gaijin needs to decompress the destroyers down to reserve to add 3 more Br’s.
Wouldnt the bismark be in a similar position in terms of AA armament? Iirc it was launched early before it was fully equiped. Then again since the krongstat is in game i see no reason why the bismark wouldnt be given its proposed armaments.
And for italy id love to see the remaining oto malera c13 designs. More light tanks is always better.
And a new low tier spaa/ light tank the oto malera gorgono. Sure its only got 25° of gun elevation but who cares every military vehicle should get added.
Actually it uses both British L7 and French 120. And its design is based on Vickers MBT Mk4 and universial turret, so it will be technically more fitted to GB tree.
Hs 129 B-1
It would have a slightly better flight performance duo lighter weight of armarment.
Differences to the in game B-2 are mostly visible sich as round air intakes.
Armarment:
2x Mg 17
2x Mg 151/15 (instead of 20mm guns like the B-2)
1x Mk 101 30rounds (instead of Mk 103)
So a bit better flight performance, heavyer AT concentration on the Mg 151/15 instead of a under belly armarment, with the Mk 101 for heavyer and big Air targets, or the possibility to leave it away to spare more weight and only go with 15mm AP belts.
