What are your thoughts on the current br system of ships. Were at 7.0 in late ww2 post war jet territory and were still in late ww1 interwar battleships.
If we keep this up are the iowa and the yamato gonna end up dealing with a10s and su25s?
I think they need to seperate ships from aircraft at around br 7.3 and add split br’s which would be a great change to naval, ground and air all simultaneously. Furthermore, the issue with WW1 ships is horribly apparent as they just don’t have the AA to compete even with early WW2 aircraft.
I think the BR system is over-compressed but I understand why that is because of a lack of players, however with an update to the UI, in addition to new ships with legacies (Waspite, Bismarck, Colorado, Nagato etc), submarines and faster progression, it could become a much more popular mode. But as of current you have CL’s fighting BB’s and BC’s and it just doesn’t work unless its something like Von der Tann, Invincible etc.
Iowa and Yamato it would depend on their br’s, maybe Gaijin needs to decompress the destroyers down to reserve to add 3 more Br’s.
1 Like
M-55
2 Likes
I love her
3 Likes
Wouldnt the bismark be in a similar position in terms of AA armament? Iirc it was launched early before it was fully equiped. Then again since the krongstat is in game i see no reason why the bismark wouldnt be given its proposed armaments.
For the US id love to see the modern m8 greyhound the EE-9 cascavel
And for italy id love to see the remaining oto malera c13 designs. More light tanks is always better.
And a new low tier spaa/ light tank the oto malera gorgono. Sure its only got 25° of gun elevation but who cares every military vehicle should get added.
3 Likes
Anymore information on this?
Would love to see Romanian SA-8B (OSA-AKM) in the Italian TT, as it’s the only nation missing such type of AA now:
Spoiler
PS obviously 9K33 for SU as well, but I think in other variant would be more interesting, maybe an earlier one.
1 Like
EE-T1 Osório: The Lost MBT
As this Brazilian tank uses a French cannon, I think it could be an event tank in the French tree.
3 Likes
Latin American tree/trees pls.
2 Likes
That would be a interesting choice, there’s a few nations that can get it
9K33M3 for USSR
9K33 for Italy
9K33M2 for Germany
Actually it uses both British L7 and French 120. And its design is based on Vickers MBT Mk4 and universial turret, so it will be technically more fitted to GB tree.
5 Likes
Better 9K33M3 (OSA-AKM or SA-8B which were used by Romania) for Italy, while 9K33 and improved Belarusian variant 9K33-1T for USSR.
Looks like new T-62M modernisation
5 Likes
Leopard 2 A0
A1-A2 and A3
4 Likes
I mentioned the first production run Leo 2 earlier. It’s a bif baffling that the game starts with the 2A4. Would the base Leo 2 fit at 10.0 you think?
3 Likes
It would certainly be a good 10.0 as the Leopard 2 AV already is.
1 Like
I like the wedge of the modern variants, but there’s something about the flat turret face.
It looks more “beefy”, like it’s going to mess you up with brute force alone. It reminds me of the Tiger 1, in that way.
But I digress, more Leopard? Yes please.
1 Like