Do they have permission to use any armaments?
Jaguar is actually in service right now and it has been since 2022, with the army receiving their first ones in 2019-2020 (I saw a few at Versailles in 2020) for testings. And even if it was not in service, it is still far more deployed than, let’s say, the 2S38 so I can’t see why not
I definitely know it’s been in service. But I cited the one suggestion with a poll in the forum that I know of.
what’s the H means? Sea or bomber?
Its the naval version, but as far as I know it can’t operate from carriers although China say it would be favourable for conversion into a fleet air defense fighter.
The Chinese air forces don’t use a Western style of having the Air Force operate land based planes, and the navy operates from carriers.
In China the PLAN take jurisdiction over pretty much all expeditionary operations but they operate some purely land-based aircraft.
oic just like what they do for J8 or H6 right? its a naval version but not a bomber
Not entirely sure if I’m honest, I only know specifically for the J-10 because I thought it would be a good counterpart to the Gripen when it drops in December.
My bad I did not read correctly as I was on my phone at that time lol
1 Like
Hopefully in December we can see the J-10 and have the PL-8B and PL-12 instead of the bullshit anti-jamming that is the PL-8
Britain wishlist:
Mostly QoL stuff I don’t care about the top tier till the Eurofighter is added.
Vickers mk.3M: Take vickers mk.3, give it thermals for Commander and Gunner, uprated engine, slather it in era and give it gen 3 apds (l64a4) and an LWS.
EE-T1 Osorio: Vickers universal turret (from the UK) as seen on the Vicker mk.4 with any of the universal cannons (L7, L11, Giat 120mm, Rh 120 L/44) but with a better (Brazilian made) hull. Weak-ish hull but the turret has chobham and all features the Vickers Mk.4 had including protection across the turret face against MILAN and Swingfire ATGM’s and all 105mm l7 kinetic projectiles up until M735.
Desert Warrior: Warrior modified (by the UK) for a specific export to Kuwait. Features a Delco turret with 25mm and 7.62mm coax. (Any of the varying warrior modifications would do not ‘light tanks’ specifically IFV’s Warrior 2000, Verdi-2 and CTA 40 work.)
.jpg.907fc56339dc5e09b6a8c9130bac4cd9.jpg)
Folland Gnat/Ajeet: British ‘Sabre Slayer’, found to be superior to the Hunter at all altitudes and speed ranges would be a good final gun-fighter for the UK similarly to the Ariete. Only lost to Hunter because the first prototype was treacherous, but this got fixed but not after the Hunter had taken off.
Hunter FGA.74BS: Singaporean export version of the Hunter F.6 (re-exported to Oman after being modified with flares), had flares and extra 2 pylons for sidewinders (AIM-9P’s) in addition to the other ordnance seen on the Hunter series and 4 wet pylons.
Supermarine Superswift (Type 545): Incremental development of the Swift airframe, made to compete with lightning. Capable of M1.2 or M1.7 depending on the engine (2 were offered), 4 firestreak/red tops and a radar (unspecified).
HMS Warspite: Very famous ship, not a huge increase in capability in comparison to already in-game battleships (she actually has a thinner belt than the Bayern). But in her 1941 refit which increased deck armour, made her a little faster (23 knots) replaced the 4 inch guns with 4.5’ dual purpose guns and gave her 32 pom-poms and 16 20mms plus better fire-control radars would be a good 7.0-7.3 and got the best refit of her class.
8 Likes
For the German TT
The only one Real Leopard 2 PSO and not the TVM PSO.
The Leopard 2SG would be nice too!
9 Likes
It’s annoying that they have modelling but not giving in PC. Currently GB is weakes among 7.0 nations and Gaijin refuse to give new battleship
upgrade for L2A4?
Yes, Singapore has acquired around 150 Leopard 2A4s from the Bundeswehr and has massively upgraded them technically.
In many pictures you can clearly see that there was no skimping on armor.
The Leopard 2SG has more in common with the Leopard 2 Revolution than with a Leopard 2A4.
You could also say that the only thing the Leo 2SG is missing from the Revolution is the active protection system and the weapon station on the roof.
whats the difference?
They’re really rich😭
Ingame we have the Test Vehicle for the Bundeswehr, which is used to test the components.
TVM = Truppenversuch Muster, whats have many different components from the 2A4//2A5 and other Testmodells
The vehicle is not necessarily intended for use, but rather for testing components in the troops.
Not everything that is tested will be used later.
The Leopard 2A7+ was developed from the TVM.
This has a modular design and can be equipped depending on the intended use.
If you look closely, we even have the second version of the TVM PSO in the game.
On Youtube you find a video from German Panzermuseum to a TVM whats the step from the 2A4 modell to the 2A5.
😊
Agreed, the UK has 1 7.0 ship, and she’s arguably the worst of the current 7.0 BC’s. Then we have our 6.7. Essentially only 2 top tier ships. I was going to suggest the KGV 1911s but they wouldn’t be top tier worthy. As of right now, we either need Warspite, or an R-Class BB.
FT-7BG
2 Likes