Next Major Update "Sky Odyssey" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

More like just US for the F-35 lmao.

how come, they were not important in early design for F-35

obviously to make sure the F-35 is a good addition, they should start by adding the F-35C and assessing its performance for at least 1-2 years

1 Like

October/November*

But Yes hopefully, would be good to get a naval focused update

1 Like

We are way overdue for a naval focused update.

2 Likes

anything but the B or C

Though after the disasterous last one, im kinda apprehensive of it tbh. The logical option would be subs, but im fearing how theyโ€™ll make the soviet subs the best by far like they did with battleships

1 Like

My bet is between those two. Probably added right for most vehicles, some clips of cases being wrong will be posted we will all have some giggles here and there and then get fixed within hotfixes or so.
Hopefully it wonโ€™t be cancelled or pushed to another update.

Hi @Smin1080p_WT In Community Update No. 12, there was a mention of a surprise related to the Israeli Air Force treeโ€”is there anything you can show us at this point?

If this is just a rename + reskin, gromvoiny can get 10% of the support points he lost the last update back.

If a new vehicle, no.

I mean, why not to sell the same vehicle twice, especially when Greece has a home tree now.

Does anyone have info about the abramโ€™s horrific armor nerfs

Making it sound like it got taken around the back and shot.

1 Like

kinda

    • M1A2:
    • 360 mm NERA layer of the hull front composite:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 48.4 โ†’ 38.7%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 130.1 โ†’ 110%
    • 800 mm NERA layer of the turret right front composite:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 90.7 โ†’ 69.6%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 157.3 โ†’ 115%
    • 800 mm NERA layer of the turret left front composite:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 90.7 โ†’ 63.5%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 157.3 โ†’ 105.5%
    • 300 mm NERA layer of the turret right side composite at the crew:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 70.7 โ†’ 120%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 195.6 โ†’ 230%
    • 300 mm NERA layer of the turret left side composite at the crew:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 70.7 โ†’ 125%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 195.6 โ†’ 230%
    • 350 mm NERA layer of the turret side composites at the ammo:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 79.7 โ†’ 71.1%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 9 โ†’ 5.2%
    • M1A2 SEP (TUSK):
    • 360 mm NERA layer of the hull front composite:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 48.4 โ†’ 37.5%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 130.1 โ†’ 109.88%
    • 800 mm NERA layer of the turret right front composite:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 90.7 โ†’ 69.6%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 157.3 โ†’ 115%
    • 800 mm NERA layer of the turret left front composite:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 90.7 โ†’ 63.5%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 157.3 โ†’ 105.5%
    • 300 mm NERA layer of the turret right side composite at the crew:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 70.7 โ†’ 130%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 195.6 โ†’ 240%
    • 300 mm NERA layer of the turret left side composite at the crew:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 70.7 โ†’ 130%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 195.6 โ†’ 235%
    • 350 mm NERA layer of the turret side composites at the ammo:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 79.7 โ†’ 75.8%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 9 โ†’ 8.3%
  • M1A2 SEPv2 (Trophy):
    • 360 mm NERA layer of the hull front composite: modifier against chemical threats: 113 โ†’ 109.88%
  • M1A2 SEPv2 (TUSK 2):
    • 360 mm NERA layer of the hull front composite:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 48.4 โ†’ 37.5%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 130.1 โ†’ 109.86%
    • 800 mm NERA layer of the turret right front composite:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 90.7 โ†’ 69.6%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 157.3 โ†’ 115%
    • 800 mm NERA layer of the turret left front composite:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 90.7 โ†’ 63.5%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 157.3 โ†’ 105.5%
    • 300 mm NERA layer of the turret right side composite at the crew:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 70.7 โ†’ 130%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 195.6 โ†’ 241.9%
    • 300 mm NERA layer of the turret left side composite at the crew:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 70.7 โ†’ 130%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 195.6 โ†’ 241.1%
    • 350 mm NERA layer of the turret side composites at the ammo:
      • modifier against kinetic threats: 79.7 โ†’ 75.8%
      • modifier against chemical threats: 9 โ†’ 8.3%

The premium peten is the same as tech tree peten anyways, it would create clones of barely used vehicles

This was dev-server, is everyone ready for R-77-1 to be more maneuverable than IRIS-T? ๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€

1 Like

So, whatever really.

Thats the Greek aviation sub tree.

4 Likes

Did any of the ARH change compared to dev?

Or is insanity gonna hit live?

Isnt the F-35I more unique ?