i am emptying entire 20mm belts and does absolutely nothing
Did they actually fix/increase it’s weight or is it still the 59.9 tons that shouldn’t be possible?
I’m away from home so I can’t check myself until friday.
lol no
Uparmored Leopard still weighs the same as unarmored one
They did remove the hull spall liners, though, which I believe to be historically correct.
I REALLY hope they add a Spanish Leopard 2E skin for the Marketplace… I WILL SELL MY SOUL FOR IT!
1 Like
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwww, that horrible how the mouse disappears over the tech tree icon I hate that
2 Likes
i just put 30 rounds of 30mm HE into a TU4 cockpit and did nothing. dw i lost one avionics block so cant fire more (this plane has two of them so this shouldnt be an issue)
and has less armor than the 2A7V btw
1 Like
Bomber fuel tanks are completely messed up. I just lost my entire fuel in a BV238 after one .50 cal run
1 Like
Should we expect any of the Greek domestic/modified import prototypes any time soon. Within this year.
True, 660 instead of 670 xD
At some typical combat angles, it goes as low as 620-630 mm KE. Not even fully immune anymore.
They made 2020s Leopard 2A7s based on the 1990s TVMs… and now, 2HEL does not even reach 1990s TVMs’ values.
The right to have immune hull armor is reserved to the 122s, it appears.
Also have a look at the Xray modules and the turret basket
Oh, yeah, at least HEL got the turret basket size/height corrected!
Which… for some reason… no other Leopard could have possibly got this update xD
And we will be lucky if they even do within 2 years. I’m hoping next update.
not corrected, it’s just rushed.
The Leopard 2 models are literally all different in armor and damage model now.
Because Leopard 2A5 has it allready since Months/years :3
@Smin1080p_WT Are you able to provide any comments on the devs’ thoughts regarding the Naval component of Nuclear Escalation?
More and more people are growing frustrated due to the fact that the rewards are extremely low and it has little to no match impact. We have been pointing this out since the first couple of test iterations of Nuclear Escalation.
Additionally, SAM site tracking radars seem to be respawning. See: Meet Nuclear Escalation: Vietnam! - #940 by Piment1
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT Ive witnessed that the aam 4 despite the changes got worse in terms of acceleration off the rail and time to target
It only got very slightly better energy retention which is negligible since the time to target is still worse
Currently its ISP is worse than the aim 7 sitting at 234 ISP while all other fox 3 (minus the fakours and pheonix) is 239 ISP
Overall it got worse than all the other missiles that got a buff this update
There is a bug report that has been open for over a year concerning the motor performance
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/77Bwjvfg7ULh
Is there any chance the aam 4 get fixed
Be sure to leave any feedback for the major update in the dedicated topic
Until next time!
11 Likes