Next Major Update "Sky Odyssey" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

Wait until later today or tomorrow if dev server is going to be extended. It’s 50/50, but if it’s not then update is maybe Tuesday or Wednesday

i suspect it’ll be extended for the missile changes, since those seem pretty big changes from live

2 Likes

rb28 probably needs to get a seeker buff since one of the reasons sweden bought them in the first place was they were “near all aspect” so could be used aginst prop powered bombers better than the sidewinders. (also high altitude performance)

Rn they dont perform any better than the aim9 (both B and P-3) when it comes to locking on to bombers. tho maybe they were this limited irl too, im no expert on them

as it stands. fun addition to the game. but sadly absolutely redundant for the planes that get it.

This is something where full compatibility can be assumed as no integration of anything is require given how old it is. For instance, all the spitfires getting bombs some didn’t use like 2 updates back. All up to gaijin at the end of the day, but it’s really the only option there is.

which is unironically good imo

1 Like

[quote=“Mr_Aero1, post:9860, topic:349380, full:true”]
One question why doenst the J16 get dual rack for the pl12´s? For example there are other top tier jets that have dual pylon for example we never saw the su30sm2 with double pylon rack with mounted r77-1´s. Why not do the same for the J16?

So with the SB2 and the S-199 I do feel Israel should be moved to rank 3 especially since we had a reworked model of the Mosquito recently. It would be short sighted to not do this as it would be a prime opportunity to do so

there is an aircraft that could still receive it

1 Like

idk im not a dev

Couldnt this be a suggestion?

if its a vehicle thats missing armament (dual rack would count under this afaik) then it’d be a bug report

Either way I wouldn’t know if/when its coming to the game or why it wouldn’t, that’s not my field ^^

ok

Thx for the help tho

1 Like

Where can I make a bug report?

So they’ve actually modelled the actual AIM-4s that could be used with F-102… and not giving those for F-102… yeaaaah… right…

images (25)

I have seen on statshark that the buffed dev server AIM 7s are way better than the current ones. How likely is this to be in the final update? And how much of a difference will this make to the low tier sparrows?

All ARH missiles have been massively buffed in dev

https://twitter.com/WarThunder/status/2098422014692167917

@Stona_WT I think this might be worth a forum post/dev blog, no?

Most, not all

1 Like

You can bug report it here: Gaijin.net // Issues (just search a bit first so that you don’t report something that is already reported and known about)

A guide on how to report bugs can be found here: ([Navigation] Technical Knowledge Base | War Thunder Wiki)