This is something where full compatibility can be assumed as no integration of anything is require given how old it is. For instance, all the spitfires getting bombs some didn’t use like 2 updates back. All up to gaijin at the end of the day, but it’s really the only option there is.
which is unironically good imo
1 Like
[quote=“Mr_Aero1, post:9860, topic:349380, full:true”]
One question why doenst the J16 get dual rack for the pl12´s? For example there are other top tier jets that have dual pylon for example we never saw the su30sm2 with double pylon rack with mounted r77-1´s. Why not do the same for the J16?
So with the SB2 and the S-199 I do feel Israel should be moved to rank 3 especially since we had a reworked model of the Mosquito recently. It would be short sighted to not do this as it would be a prime opportunity to do so
there is an aircraft that could still receive it
1 Like
idk im not a dev
Couldnt this be a suggestion?
if its a vehicle thats missing armament (dual rack would count under this afaik) then it’d be a bug report
Either way I wouldn’t know if/when its coming to the game or why it wouldn’t, that’s not my field ^^
ok
Thx for the help tho
1 Like
Where can I make a bug report?
So they’ve actually modelled the actual AIM-4s that could be used with F-102… and not giving those for F-102… yeaaaah… right…
1 Like
I have seen on statshark that the buffed dev server AIM 7s are way better than the current ones. How likely is this to be in the final update? And how much of a difference will this make to the low tier sparrows?
All ARH missiles have been massively buffed in dev
https://twitter.com/WarThunder/status/2098422014692167917
@Stona_WT I think this might be worth a forum post/dev blog, no?
Most, not all
1 Like
You can bug report it here: Gaijin.net // Issues (just search a bit first so that you don’t report something that is already reported and known about)
A guide on how to report bugs can be found here: ([Navigation] Technical Knowledge Base | War Thunder Wiki)
Changelog my dude 😎
man if there was only a place where they list changes
I think the change is big enough to warrant a devblog, especially since they are asking for feedback.