@Smin1080p_WT May I ask if the Devs realise the model we have in WT (Currently) is a H145M LUH SOF (Light Utility Helicopter Special Operations Forces) and not a H145M LKH (Light Attack Helicopter)?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8udu7c4T6RGJ
Weaponry is still subject to balancing decisions even if it is technically compatible. So its naturally not going to receive AIM-9L even if it was due to its BR.
Regarding Penguin, you would need to provide evidence to make a report for that. As it was a spesific Norwegian upgrade and not something universal like the flares possible on the F-5A family.
At this point however, we are now wildly off track yet again.
We should let smin sleep now
The forwarded report is under investigation.
Could you at least bring it to the devs attention that people want CMs on the J35J
I mean we could count our prototype F model with Countermeasures as it flew under SAAB.
We have multiple Drakens with older models than the J using BOY 402 which if service year isn’t a problem then the J should get it
Austria had the D model and they got BOY 402
We had the F and got BOY 402 and more
Finland has a J model with BOY 402
breadpoint for all other mods but for Smin we gotta bring the heavy artillery…
we got to hold him at EAPoint
This has been raised already and the answer has already been provided. As I have explained, if you would like to see them and have evidence to support them being compatible, please submit a proper report: Community Bug Reporting System
Currently the evidence available to the devs suggests they are not, hence why they have not been added to the J35J.
Im sorry to say that coming at me over and over is not going to change that.
And yet it doesnt mention the H145M LUH SOF ≠ H145M LKH :(
Additionally I’ll add that the tailhook mod is compatible with all Drakens, it’s an upgrade choice as all Drakens never changed the rear.
We are the only ones that used them and the mount for the tail hook CM rail.
Technical feasibility is all there as it was an option for all Drakens.
heavy artillery is right
this man is on the frontlines for the entire dev season idk how he does it and stays sane
If there are issues there, then please make a report.
i think it could also receive the F-35’s RWR
I mean, we did, all we got was
you didnt proved its not possible
So then sadly without new information, there is nothing further I can do either.
Could you please let me know if this bug report has been forwarded and accepted? It is a very annoying bug and makes the game more difficult when not using cyclical switching. I feel like it’s a core gameplay issue regarding radar, so it’s pretty important.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/QfYdQF7JK50K
Resume

So none of the devs think it’s possible a J model could get the same BOY 402 modification seen in 3 separate model Drakens?
One that’s literally the same model which is Finlands and we all have them mounted the same way on the side of the engine?
Resume

We also have the model Saab made to sell to us with the BOY 402
The endless pit of reports with not enough evidence.
None of these variants are the J variant, so again, because there are 3 Drakens with countermeasures, doesn’t mean all Drakens could.
Again, we welcome any reports with new information, but this is not the place: Community Bug Reporting System
Will the Greek Mirage 2000 get all ground weapons other Mk.2 could carry?
