Burden of proof would lie with the person making the bug report. You would have to prove these changes were permanent on this variant as well.
The devs said that “However there was no removal of compatibility with the aircraft.” and i am asking HOW they know that
Not enough in my opinion, but it should work for now. I hope more will get added in the future.
Good old balans decisions.
Looks like only one of J35F2 descendants are getting only the extra pylons as external modifications and becoming flare capable.
The wait paid off ;)
An assumption that can be made as no proof has been provided to prove the contrary.
The photos point to the direction that they were removed, the is not a single photo of the rear guns
1 Like
no flares on j35j sucks…
will be a spade and never play again vehicle since i have the j35xs and its identical but with flares.
predictable that it wouldnt get as they historically didnt but was hoping for it to be given for ballance reasons.
far from the only 10.3 without flares but when an identical plane with flares exists its just kinda meh. at least the xs isnt available anymore so it doesnt seem like a push to get ppl to buy the premium version.
a bit more disapointing when there are other planes that shouldnt have flares that get them due to ballance.
Not a single photo that was provided shows the changes were permanent either. The ones you’ve shown me only show that the gun was removed, but it’s not clear if the ability to remount it was entirely removed. The full extent of the changes are not clear enough, so you simply need better pictorial or documentation if you want to report it again.
@Smin1080p_WT
Hello,
Any decompression in plans for the near future?
I think the 10.7 to 13.7 would greatly benefit from further decompression.
i have this but its not a photo were it shows him turned and no gun in sight
1 Like
No, I am not an employee. I’m not sure about trust etc., it may be there but I have no idea.
1 Like
The cope is real with this one.
There isn’t a single source claiming that nor any valid proof, every picture of one is without one,
Even the museum ones lack them.
The picture in question
They look like they have a cannon, it doesn’t look like AN/M2.
Could that cannon looking thing be another pitot tube?
(Nevermind your talking about the gunner I think )
even in that there is no guns and you can aww there is no mechanism to put the guns, also even if i go to athens take a photo of the back seat and show it to them that there permanently changes they will say “happened after”
1 Like
That’s what am talking about
at least if they don’t do that they should give as the tailhook back as it is “technically compatible”
1 Like
i guess they can do that but removing 2 guns and closing a cockpit is hard work, also i am confused on what their source is that this things happened…
Oh, I get it, you want to keep an air of mystery 😎