Next week. Maybe. Definitely before Friday
if this was a swedish vehicle it would be covered in fictional spall liners, 800mm ke a new turret with shard and sit at 12.0
1 Like
Only if it’s an MBT though, somehow Gaijin balances out their love for Swedish MBTs by screwing over everything else in their tree.
Patiently waiting for dev update
V2
We already know whats coming ;)
“It is imperative that we give Sweden the three best armored tanks in the entire game in the form of 3x Strv 122s. It is also imperative that they get the very best shell compatible with their gun even though it never used it and the other one it had was more than enough.
By the way, give the 2A7s an armor that’s underperforming by 80mm, and same for EMBT, and then then give EMBT the worst shell it could possibly have.”
3 Likes
if you wanna look at a screwd over tree look at france or china, sweden is one if not the most preferentially treated tree
I can never understand ground mains having hype when ground devs just been adding constant side-grades at the same exact battle rating of current vehicles, if not being slightly better, for nearly several years on end.
EMBT first version if it stays as is should probably drop down to 12.0-12.3, like Leclercs S1 and S2
3 Likes
this will never happen because gaijin wont balance by necessity and only by stats and aslong as sweden doesnt pull away from leclerc performance its all fine for gaijin.
And they were sitting at 1.10 for strv 122b+ and 1.4 kd for leclerc azur at the start of the year
Will J-16 get dual racks this update?
- Yes
- No
0
voters
80mm? Try up to 180mm
Yeah, OFL F1 just isn’t 12.7 material.
And to anyone bringing up Russian tanks: I think T-90s should be 12.3. Yeah, and same goes for Black Night and Challenger 2E.
Well, or better yet: just start decompressing already and throw the 122s, 2A7s, SEPv3s and future T-14 into 13.3, with 13.0 being for most current 12.7s and 12.7 being for the current 12.7s that shouldn’t be 12.7.
6 Likes
there used to be so many tradeoffs with everything at top tier
like tanks with worse armour generally got better rounds and vice versa
but now everything gets basically its maximum theoretical performance and it makes for a far less interesting and less varied and everything that gets used all become jack of all trades kinda
260mm,180mm from the underperforming internal armor that still use C-tech instead of D-tech (C-tech have 420mm KE, D-tech have 600mm KE) and 80mm from underperforming addon ufp
Probably not.
While it’s true that the racks are in the files already, I think the devs themselves might possibly be still looking for sources, before implementing them.
Or simply they are waiting for a non-AI-slop report to prove their actual use.
1 Like
I’m ngl, one of the key benefits of having the EMBT added to the German tree with no DM53 is that:
-
German players actually get to see how playing with a Leclerc is like compared with their Leopards, and that they’re not actually suffering, and no, speed is not better or equal to actual armor.
-
Gaijin can now properly get statistics on what’s essentially a Leclerc, played by the same players using the German Leopard 2s. Currently French Leclercs have better stats than the German and Swedish Leopard 2s which skews the developer’s perception of the Leclerc performance. A German Leclerc showing up with worse statistical performance than German Leopard 2s provides undeniable clarity into the situation.
2 Likes
So I guess if it doesn’t show up in today’s dev-server update, then it probably isn’t dropping alongside the major update?
If I had to guess, yeah.
Also doubt they’ll extend the dev further.
1 Like
Screwed tree and France is hilarious. Israel deserves that mention much more than France.