He also said this
Yeah there’s that mention of stress reload times which I’ve seen before
same, guess we got the answer then
Hey
Nuclear Thunder is currently the larger scale maps in testing that incorporate much of this. Beyond that, its not possible to say at this stage.
I wonder if we’ll ever see 5s, but that would also mean (if that happens) its possible for the Type 10 to do like 3.3 or 2s (heard rumours) when in an emergency
Any chance you could pass these?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/k8LngXLri9cj
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/mmREeO56oiyj
Sounds to me like there’s no counter argument then to having mica get smokeless motor.
i appreciate the reply!!
But knowing Gaijin, they’ll apply it to only one and not the other, like they did for the MICA EM seeker buff.
So if only one is to get it, then the Aim-120 should be the priority
That’s if there’s no balance consideration on the part of developers. In the developer’s eyes, they may see everything as equal, especially with the new buffs, and as such the smokeless motor should first be given to the lowest impact situations so it can be evaluated before giving it out like candy even more.
Even with these changes. MICA EM and R-77-1 will remain the strongest missile, as range still remains one of the least important attributes until the seekers also get buffed.

So, where’s the AMX-13-105 in WT ? Huh, Gaijn?
Next update, France cannot have much love per update
Edit: They don’t need it much but I would trade AMX-13-105 with DF-105
The 5 seconds is correct, but so is 7.5 seconds.
(Depending on configuration. The safe (training exercise) reload speed is roughly 7.5s, but can be stressed to 5.0s in cases of emergency (like combat) according to some sources.)
Just the Dutch service AMX-13-105 would be perfect, as France didn’t have it in service.
You’re not wrong in that range is the least important attribute, but the AIM-120 did have one of its few weaknesses fixed, which is acceleration within the 15km range domain. This means a quicker time-to-target and less time to defeat/notch the missile which was one of MICA’s and R-77-1’s advantages.
I dont think these changes are that radical that its brought them onto parity with either MICA or R-77-1
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.