Is the j16A that shown on the dev stream and that is on the dev server is the latest block variant or an bit older one?
Hello @Smin1080p_WT hope you’re doing well. Could you please forward this issue to the dev team or have someone take a look when you get a chance? Thanks! This issue is about Israel need helicopter with Dircm in the game.
There is the link:Community Bug Reporting System
Thank you so much
1 Like
A lot of vehicles left the forgotten lands lately
Commonwealth enjoyers on their way to suggest Commonwealth vehicles for the UK tree.
2 Likes
Hey @Smin1080p_WT
Do you have any news on the extra set of pylons that have been reported for the Hawk T.1As?
Thanks a lot
Hey. The devs are conducting investigations, however currently it directly conflicts with the manuals for the Hawk T.1As. So they are searching for additional information.
It appears likely the standard Hawk T.1As did not have them, but certain aircraft were modified to demonstrate the Mk 50 series for the export market.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT was wondering, is there any Fix in sight this patch or still no ETA?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/QaZLcmWSrJTk
yo what is this about
these aircraft getting a g limiter this update? didnt hear that anywhere.
The RAFs Hawks had the pylons structurally and were compatible with them, they just weren’t fitted (aside from prototypes and demonstrators)
They could be fitted with extra pylons with minimal modifications though.
2 Likes
Hi again Smin,
There have been quite a few requests from the community regarding having additional vehicles added to the dev server testing of regenerative steering.
Most notably the Challenger 2, as this is viewed by the community as a vehicle which could have immense benefits from the new system. Likewise, the M1 Abrams and Leclerc may have their mobility signficantly altered.
Therefore, I was wondering if the devs plan to include more high tier MBTs in the current regenerative steering test on the dev server?
Thanks
This doesn’t specify a variant and no date is present, which is also not helpful to know at what point in the T.1 / T.1 lifespan this was. So this doesn’t add anything not already known or part of the existing reports that have shown modified T.1s for demonstration purposes.
Sadly the manuals are currently the most authoritative source available. So it will be down to the developers to decide based on that.
As the test goes on, its entirely possible it will be expanded to more vehicles. At this time however, its not possible to say specifically which ones.
1 Like
Any new DM changes would be updated within the changelog. As mentioned last update, some elements of it were already implemented.
I guess i am just gonna take this as its gonna end like the Leopard 2 DM rework then TT
@Smin1080p_WT I’m sorry but what kind of flawed logic of a response is this?
“It was compatible” okay? It still didn’t ever have it under Greek service, why devoid something of it’s uniqueness and slightly different gameplay it could offer cause the devs are too lazy to do minimum modeling.
This is a fake vehicle.
what vehicle is that even about?
The context is majorily missing there
The Greek helldiver
Compatibility with something has always been the main requirement, providing it can be proven. As its proven the capability remained, it makes the aircraft more able to defend itself.
It already has several changes to the model to make it unique too:
SB2C-5 Helldiver dive bomber, which was delivered to Greece in the spring of 1949. The Greek Helldiver is a land-based version of the dive bomber without an arresting hook and with modified landing gear.
There isn’t anything “fake” about it. Simply the rear machine gun could be taken our or reinstalled.
the fact for me is how they know it was still compatible? with what sources they claim that
1 Like