Hey @Smin1080p_WT , hope you had a good weekend.
If you are able to tell us, is there a specific reason, for example licensing or something like that, why the AIDC F-CK-1 hasn’t been added yet, or is it just not it’s time yet and it’s still planned to be added at some point in the future?
It’s a very interesting plane and I’m sure many players would love to see it ingame.
Thanks
I don’t believe licensing has ever been required for Gaijin, has it?
We already have that, at least in air RB. It doesnt not matter at all with current engagement distances. At 3-4km altitude, your distance to horizon is between 200-240km.
well, I don’t know, that’s why I’m asking.
The F-CK-1 would be really intersting and as far as I know there’s no reason why it wouldn’t have already been added before.
Its simply just not its time yet. Much like the Hawk T.1A is just joining the game this update. As it was also a very highly requested aircraft.
Thanks for the answer!
I’ll look forward to when it’ll come.
On another note: What 5th-Gen Aircraft are you looking forward to the most, if any?
Only doing the modelling for a single mode makes little sense and I’m extremely certain it does not exist in GRB or Nuclear Escalation.
Do you have anything to back that claim up?
Either way, I already said ARB is not the primary mode I’d want that for. Its NE with a potential shakeup in GRB as a side effect.
@Smin1080p_WT changes were made to the British GP bombs for Sky Guardian, including a slight reduction in points cost. Thanks again to the responding volunteers for the manner with which they handled this, and to devs for the very fast implementation.
Are the outstanding issues with the two MC series bombs being considered for this update? In short;
See report; The M.C. 500 lb Mk. I is completely wrong by @FlyingOstridge
I would suggest changing the earlier 500 lb MC to match the report, while the 500 lb HE MC could be repurposed to represent a late or post-war mark with more effective aluminiumised filler such as Minol or Torpex. This could be used to free British WW2 and postwar aircraft from their reliance on American AN GP bombs as their top-tier bomb, making the tree a little more unique.
Examples;
@Smin1080p_WT are you able to forward this report to the devs? would really apreciate it. The F-102 really needs the rocket computer
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/h08d3AS2KZEG
Gaijin can and usually does multiple celebrations/events at once so I don’t see why not
yes
Click top left.
(General discussion - Dev Server)
Hello @Smin1080p_WT , I was wondering if devs consider raising 1st person view height of CITV on Leopard 2HEL, like they have done with Strv122A some time ago. This isn’t much of a bug report contender as it’s purely developer choice.
i would say that i am mostly intrested in the jaguar and the maybe the mig29k more than the rafale and the MKI
I want to believe
I saw it brought up in another thread but will there be any changes to the J22M for nuclear thunder? right now it sits at 9.0 in air battles but has A2G weapons similar to that of jets at 10.7 in regular battles that seems fine but in nuclear thunder where CAS is far more prevalent it will dominate the 9.0 bracket.
is there any chance the jet might receive R-60Ms and moved to 10.3-10.7?
