Next Major Update "Sky Odyssey" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

This isn’t assuming anything, this is me saying that we won’t know how these missiles will be modelled until they are added to planes, so the worries of them potentially being impossible to deal with are valid

1 Like

i am saying that what i said was stated under that assumption, i couldve worded it more clearly

1 Like

Fair

It’s going to be interesting to see, if top tier gameplay is actually gonna change with the introduction of newer missiles or 5th gens

There are plenty of things that could have a big impact, if Gaijin decides to properly model them

But future top tier could also be the exact same as current top tier, but with different models lol

Being someone that likely won’t play top tier much, I just hope that they put more effort into avoiding BR compression in the future

Stratofortress for a reason

Can anyone tell me the difference between the British aesa typhoon versus the Italian version. Trying to figure out what to grind.

the only difference is that the british one gets a laser warning reciver

which dosent make a difference since it only triggers if someone fires laser guided stuff at you

1 Like

stealth will make it easier to notch missiles, and at least US 5th gens have IR signature reduction measures so there will probably be some gameplay shift with that

@Smin1080p_WT Hello Smin1080p_WT . Here is an issue about Israel’s ah60 that the administrator needs to take a look. This was sent 3 months ago. Thank you.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jMLWd4SqDZpJ

@Smin1080p_WT , are you aware if a detailed cockpit is planned for the H145M?

The N3 class would be very good if added there armor would be almost unstoppable

1 Like

Go for italy, The italian one gets 10 meteors and 5 IRIS-T’s + Free pasta and more downtiers.

1 Like

That source is a sales proposal to Singapore.

image

That doesn’t say anything about any specific vehicle using the system in service.

1 Like

I wonder if they’ll ever make it so that IRST with laser ranging will trigger it

Well, if a laser is involved, it should indeed be triggered (unless the laser somehow is low power enough to not be detected)

Which then is an entirely different matter in war thunder

Like Stormer HVM’s laser shouldnt trigger LWR but does.

But Rafales (and other IRST with laser ranging) IRST doesnt trigger LWR.

So it would be nice to get some better consistancy

1 Like

my false,i‘ll change that

You should use S-35E Drakens for your report as they are the only swedish Drakens with CMs, that or the Finnish XS and suggest compatibility like the F-5C as the XS is a J model

1 Like

There are a lot of air to air missiles that have laser proximity fuse, maybe that can also trigger LWS irl.

I think by the time those would trigger LWR, it would be a bit too late.

But if you get LWR warnings from an IRST, then you might have warning that someone is about to fire an IR missile at you via an IRST lock.

Yes, but when they do, its kind of too late to do anything.

1 Like