Lad, that was the thing I asked Smin. But the PzH.2000 we are getting is based of the only 2 PzH.2000 100% german, not modifications or nothing by Italy, that Italy bought before to test them and all.
That why I asked if we will get the Italian PzH.2000 too, and not just the German copy-paste.
Edit: Ik the Italian had the LwS, also with GALIX, and other things. And that’s the one I thought at first Italy would get, but I was a fool to believe they wouldn’t be that lazy to just Cntrl C + Cntrl V.
I don’t know why, but I had the idea that K/S might be a better metric to determine air to air performance, but that makes not much sense. I think I’m too tired right now to discuss this properly.
It is too bad that statshark can’t filter based on mode and always includes deaths from both ARB and GRB.
I will admit that now knowing that the ground kills don’t get factored in, the Rafale and the Typhoons definitely perform better.
From a specs point of view (ignoring player performance) I still think the F-15C GE should be (or rather, should have been, now that the pylons are being fixed) 14.7. Either that or the J-15T should sit at 14.3 and a bunch of 14.3s should sit at 14.0.
That’s just a compression problem though.
@Smin1080p_WT How long must Germany’s Leopard 2A7V maintain an incorrect armor protection rating?
Germany’s sequence of additional armored development was as follows. After the IVT, whose name was changed due to the installation of the IFIS (Integrated Command and Information System) system at KVT, the KVT, IVT, and other development vehicles followed. Based on the experience gained from this development program, a prototype of the TVM series was produced.
The TVM Max later demonstrated an armored protection level associated with Sweden’s Strv 122 series. The vehicle developed from the TVM series was the Leopard 2A6EX. Starting with Leopard 2A6EX, the Leopard 2A7 series adopted the same protection testing approach and added several improvements.
But why haven’t Germany’s Leopard 2A7V and Hungary’s Leopard 2A7, Embt, and others yet been modified to reflect a protection rating like TVM’s? It appears to maintain a lower protection rating, corresponding to earlier IVT technology. Even though the bug lift passed
I’m not suggesting that anything besides the J-15T should actually be moved down.
What I was trying to say is that compared to the F-15C GE certain 14.3s really seem pretty week, that includes the PoBIT as you mentioned, but also the F-16V, the F/A-18E/F and (at least according to what I’ve heard from others) the J-10C.
As I’ve said, this is a compression problem and actually moving anything down just makes it worse.
Now that the F-15C GE is getting that missile rack fix, I am completely on board with it staying at 14.3, but prior to that, it should have been sitting at 14.7 with the Typhoons and Rafales for the sake of even the tiniest bit of decompression.
Hopefully Gaijin will raise the top BR again soon…
