The picture in question
They look like they have a cannon, it doesn’t look like AN/M2.
Could that cannon looking thing be another pitot tube?
(Nevermind your talking about the gunner I think )
even in that there is no guns and you can aww there is no mechanism to put the guns, also even if i go to athens take a photo of the back seat and show it to them that there permanently changes they will say “happened after”
2 Likes
That’s what am talking about
at least if they don’t do that they should give as the tailhook back as it is “technically compatible”
1 Like
i guess they can do that but removing 2 guns and closing a cockpit is hard work, also i am confused on what their source is that this things happened…
Oh, I get it, you want to keep an air of mystery 😎
Thank you very much
If this report goes through they’ll probably put up a 10 meter bronze statue of BowieKnife99 somewhere in China to honor him.
4 Likes
Art is not a source, the photo you showed me the other day (and was posted below your message) is considered one, but its quality is low and cannot conclusively provide what is needed.
The pilot being turned around means nothing, as equipment is found there on all helldivers (even modeled ingame) behind them, and they are meant to be able to access these instruments.
Get a picture of the interior of it, that’s my advice.
There is no cope to be found here, as I said earlier I’m simply playing devils advocate here and sharing my understanding of gaijin’s logic with you. That is all.
Although that’s not guaranteed, it’s still possible. Images of museum examples have been accepted in the past. It’s worth a shot.
Yeah museums aren’t normally trusted, if that were the case the F-35 would have 4x missiles lol museum staff thought it looked cooler on display with them even though they can’t be fired.
Will the ASM-3 receive its passive radar homing?
1 Like
Sweden barely got something in the latest update and you don’t give the J35J the 12 flares while the F5C does? For balancing features it should get the flares, with no RWR. I waited so long for this Draken only to have it as a F4C in the Swedish tech tree, probably dying from a Mig-25 or from a Magic-1. I’m with Pheonix on this one. We don’t need to chill. We need the planes that we deserve in the Swedish tech tree and fight for it.
Seeing all these bug report really makes me think I should prepare ahead of time for the Polish tech tree 🤔
1 Like
I mean J35J and XS are the same model the argument of different variant was already silly.
If anything you also have the R35E which has them in swedish service or J35F1 and F2 with CMs
2 Likes
The F-5C retains technical compatibility with the earlier A. Should this be proven for the J35J, then it can be considered.
The temperature of the discussion did. Its possible to disagree with something and voice an opinion without getting aggressive. We dont need to throw civility out the window to make a point heard.
Smin where did you or the devs get the idea that it it wouldn’t be compatible? The XS started out as a F model and became a J model, no reason another J model couldn’t mount those CMs, especially when other swedish recon models got them.
It’s not trying to sound rude but I don’t know where you are assuming they aren’t compatible
2 Likes
10.3 without flares, fighting against ir missiles with 35g overload
it’ll be really enjoyable to use the j35j
1 Like